Journal Article
Consulting Forestry / Certification and Ecosystem Services
James Coufal; Carl Wiedemann; Jacob Gorman; Larry Teeter; Yaoqi Zhang; Michael Kilgore; Kristell Miller; Stephanie Snyder; Sun Chang; Miriam Davis; Stanley Asah; J. Mark Fly; Galen Wright; Brandon Kaetzel; Indrajit Majumdar; Larry Teeter; Brett Butler; Janean Creighton; Christopher Schnepf; Amy Grotta; Sylvia Kantor; Cindy Miner; Jacek Siry; Tom Harris; Bob Izlar; Theodore Beauvais; Shorna Allred; Allyson Muth; Jim Finley; Peter Smallidge; Alex Metcalf; Lillian Woods; Gregorio Cruz; Mary Tyrrell; Brett Butler; Purnima Chawla; Dave Bubser; Kathryn Fernholz; David Puttock; Gary Dodge; Paul Pingrey; Jianbang Gan; Chris Farley; Giana Gallo; Robert Deal; David Cass; Brian Levo; Elizabeth Lott; Robert Deal; Nikola Smith; Jeffrey Kline; Dale Blahna; Trista Patterson; Thomas Spies; Jeffrey Kline; Marisa Mazzotta; Dale Blahna; Stanley Asah; James Friday; Travis Idol; Paul Scowcroft; Dean Meason; Rodolfo Martinez-Morales; John Munsell; Matthew Brinckman; Scott Barrett; Jennifer Gagnon; Brian Bond; Allison Welde; Kevin Ceder; Jeffrey Comnick; Gregory Ettl; Paul Fischer; Robert Grala; Ian Munn; Donald Grebner; Stephen Grado; Anwar Hussain; Kevin Hunt; Daniel Petrolia; Todd Gartner; Dean Meason; Auro Almeida; Heidi Dungey; Zhimei Guo; Matthew Gray; Donald Hodges
Journal of Forestry · Vol. 109, Issue 8 · pp. 530-537 · 2011
Abstract
45The industrialization of the United States throughout the 19th century resulted in the exploitation of millions of acres of timberland across the country. Logging during that era was described by critics as “cut out and get out” because the land was usually abandoned after the merchantable timber was exhausted. Concern about future timber supplies and the effect of logging on watersheds spurred the development of professional forestry after the Civil War. The first forestry leaders, including Bernhard Fernow and Gifford Pinchot, encouraged private non-industrial forest owners to sustainably manage their woodlands and specifically warned against destructive logging practices—including “cutting the best and leaving the rest”—aka high-grading. During the 1920s and 30s both the Forest Service and SAF spurred initiatives to encourage sustainable timber harvesting practices on private forestland. Although great progress has been made in forest management, logging on most private non-industrial forest land in the east has not changed significantly since the 19th century. Landowners usually sell timber without using the services of a forester, allowing the buyer to selectively cut the most valuable trees in the woodlot. Although this can reduce future value by 70-90%, it remains common practice because both the landowner and the timber buyer maximize short term income. The timber value and productivity of millions of acres of woodland throughout the United States have been significantly degraded as a result. This paper will trace the history of high-grading as described by forestry leaders from the 19th century through the 21st and will show that much work remains unfinished.
Bibliographic Information
| Journal | Journal of Forestry |
|---|
| Publisher | Springer |
|---|
| Publication Date | 2011-12-01 |
|---|
| Publication Year | 2011 |
|---|
| Volume | 109 |
|---|
| Issue | 8 |
|---|
| Pages | 530-537 |
|---|
| Document Type | Journal Article |
|---|
| Print ISSN | 0022-1201 |
|---|
| eISSN | 1938-3746 |
|---|
| DOI | 10.1093/jof/109.8.530 |
|---|
Access Information
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.