NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

The patterns of curriculum change processes that embed sustainability in higher education institutions

Marie Weiss; Matthias Barth; Henrik von Wehrden
Sustainability Science · Vol. 16, Issue 5 · pp. 1579-1593 · 2021

Abstract

Implementing education for sustainable development (ESD) in higher education institutions (HEIs) is critical to facilitating a transition toward sustainable development. However, little is known about the specific implementation processes that lead to the institutionalization of sustainability curricula in HEIs. This meta-study and cluster analysis uses 131 international case studies to shed light on six distinct implementation patterns: (1) collaborative paradigm change, (2) bottom-up, evolving institutional change, (3) top-down, mandated institutional change, (4) externally driven initiatives, (5) isolated initiatives, and (6) limited institutional change. A cluster comparison reveals two distinct implementation phases: ESD can be implemented from the bottom-up, from the top-down, or both, and the impetus can stem from manifold external or internal stakeholders. To achieve more comprehensive ESD implementation, open communication among all stakeholders should be facilitated and feedback as well as reflection encouraged. Maintaining a unified vision statement and active participation of all stakeholders fosters a sense of ownership in ESD implementation and ensures that it will be long-lasting. Collaboration between isolated ESD initiatives and various stakeholders leads to shared knowledge and resources. Strong informal collaboration and communication can compensate for a lack of formalized leadership support from the top. Moreover, thorough planning that involves creating a strategy with detailed steps, and balancing shared responsibilities among internal stakeholders further enables fuller implementation of ESD. This analysis represents a first synthesis of small-N case studies and facilitates a better understanding of sustainability curriculum implementation patterns, which are shared in different contexts. Most HEIs and practitioners can benefit from these findings by reflecting on the specific implementation pattern with which the most overlap is found and focusing on this pattern’s most pertinent drivers.

Bibliographic Information

JournalSustainability Science
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2021-09-01
Publication Year2021
Volume16
Issue5
Pages1579-1593
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN1862-4065
eISSN1862-4057
DOI10.1007/s11625-021-00984-1

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage2006-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/11625
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.