NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Using an Accelerated Undergraduate Needs Finding Course to Build Skills, Inspire Confidence, and Promote Interest in Health Technology Innovation

Lyn Denend; Susie Spielman; Ross Venook; Ravinder D. Pamnani; David Camarillo; James Wall; Joseph Towles
Biomedical Engineering Education · Vol. 3, Issue 2 · pp. 319-329 · 2023

Abstract

Many undergraduate educational experiences in biomedical design lack clinical immersion-based needs finding training for students. Convinced of the merits of this type of training for undergraduates, but unable to offer a quarter-long course due to faculty and administrative constraints, we developed an accelerated block-plan course, during which students were dedicated solely to our class for 3 weeks. The course focused on the earliest stages of the health technology innovation process—conducting effective clinical observations and performing comprehensive need research and screening. We grounded the course in experiential learning theory (with hands-on, collaborative, and immersive experiences) and constructivist learning theory (where students integrated prior knowledge with new material on need-driven innovation). This paper describes the design of this intensive block-plan course and the teaching methods intended to support the achievement of five learning objectives. We used pre- and post-course surveys to gather self-reported data about the effect of the course on student learning. Despite the accelerated format, we saw statistically significant gains for all but one sub-measure across the learning objectives. Our experience supports key benefits of the block-plan model, and the results indicate that specific course design choices were effective in achieving positive learning outcomes. These design decisions include (1) opportunities for students to practice observations before entering the clinical setting; (2) a framework for the curriculum that reinforced important concepts iteratively throughout the program; (3) balanced coverage of preparation, clinical immersion, and need research; (4) extensive faculty and peer coaching; and (5) providing hands-on prototyping opportunities while staying focused on need characterization rather than solution development. Based on our experience, we expect that this model is replicable across institutions with limited bandwidth to support clinical immersion opportunities.

Bibliographic Information

JournalBiomedical Engineering Education
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2023-07-01
Publication Year2023
Volume3
Issue2
Pages319-329
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN2730-5937
eISSN2730-5945
DOI10.1007/s43683-023-00109-3

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage2021-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/43683
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.