NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Non-Invasive Evaluation of Pulmonary Artery Stenosis in Congenital Heart Disease Patients Using Phase Contrast MRI

Rupak K. Banerjee; Gavin A. D’Souza; Shreyash M. Manegaonkar; Israel O. Ajiboye; Michael D. Taylor
Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology · 2026

Abstract

Background Branch pulmonary artery (PA) stenosis is a significant congenital heart defect causing elevated pulmonary blood pressure, trans-stenotic pressure drop, and abnormal differential blood flow to the lungs. We propose combined pressure-flow diagnostic parameters, pressure drop coefficient ( CDP ) and normalized energy loss ( Ē loss ) for improved delineation of stenosis severity. In extension to our previous benchtop experimental study, we performed in vitro experiments using phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC MRI) to evaluate the diagnostic parameters and stenosis severity non-invasively. Methods Subject-specific branch PA test sections representing the main, left, and right PAs (MPA, LPA, and RPA) with a discrete LPA stenosis were manufactured from medical images using additive manufacturing. Three clinically-relevant stenosis severities, 70% area stenosis (AS), 80% AS, and 90% AS, were evaluated at 2 LPM cardiac output under pathophysiologic hemodynamics generated using a mock circulatory loop. 2D (all severities) and 3D (only 70% AS) PC MRI scans were performed to compute the velocity (or flow) and derived pressure drop across the PA test section. The CDP LPA and $${\overline{E} }_{loss, LPA}$$ E ¯ l o s s , L P A were evaluated for the three stenosis severities using MRI measurements and compared against results from the benchtop study. Results The CDP LPA increased with an increase in LPA stenosis severity [70% AS: 11 (2D PC), 11.5 (3D PC); 80% AS: 34.6; 90% AS: 154.2]. These values resulted in an absolute difference of within 107 (2D PC) and 3 (3D PC) compared to the benchtop values. Interestingly, the CDP LPA computed by all three methods (benchtop, 2D and 3D PC MRI) showed distinct and non-overlapping ranges for each stenosis severity [70% AS: 11.0–14.5; 80% AS: 34.6–60.7; and 90% AS: 154.2–261.6]. The $${\overline{E} }_{loss, LPA}$$ E ¯ l o s s , L P A (absolute) generally increased with an increase in LPA stenosis severity, except for 90% [70% AS: − 435 mJ per Q LPA (2D PC), − 376 mJ per Q LPA (3D PC); 80% AS: − 945 mJ per Q LPA ; 90% AS: − 933 mJ per Q LPA (Q LPA –LPA flow rate)]. Conclusions The CDP LPA demonstrates an improved diagnostic capability over $${\overline{E} }_{loss, LPA}$$ E ¯ l o s s , L P A in accurately delineating unilateral PA stenosis severity. Further, PC MRI is a comprehensive and safe clinical modality for the non-invasive diagnosis of branch PA stenosis.

Bibliographic Information

JournalCardiovascular Engineering and Technology
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2026-05-28
Publication Year2026
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN1869-408X
eISSN1869-4098
DOI10.1007/s13239-026-00843-z

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage2010-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/13239
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.