Journal Article
Heavy-metal associated breast cancer and colorectal cancer hot spots and their demographic and socioeconomic characteristics
Madeline M. Tomlinson; Felicia Pugh; Alexandra N. Nail; Johnnie D. Newton; Karen Udoh; Stephie Abraham; Sandy Kavalukas; Brian Guinn; Rulla M. Tamimi; Francine Laden; Hari S. Iyer; J. Christopher States; Matthew Ruther; C. Tyler Ellis; Natalie C. DuPré
Cancer Causes & Control · Vol. 35, Issue 10 · pp. 1367-1381 · 2024
Abstract
Purpose Cancer registries offer an avenue to identify cancer clusters across large populations and efficiently examine potential environmental harms affecting cancer. The role of known metal carcinogens (i.e., cadmium, arsenic, nickel, chromium(VI)) in breast and colorectal carcinogenesis is largely unknown. Historically marginalized communities are disproportionately exposed to metals, which could explain cancer disparities. We examined area-based metal exposures and odds of residing in breast and colorectal cancer hotspots utilizing state tumor registry data and described the characteristics of those living in heavy metal-associated cancer hotspots. Methods Breast and colorectal cancer hotspots were mapped across Kentucky, and area-based ambient metal exposure to cadmium, arsenic, nickel, and chromium(VI) were extracted from the 2014 National Air Toxics Assessment for Kentucky census tracts. Among colorectal cancer ( n = 56,598) and female breast cancer ( n = 77,637) diagnoses in Kentucky, we used logistic regression models to estimate Odds Ratios (ORs) and 95% Confidence Intervals to examine the association between ambient metal concentrations and odds of residing in cancer hotspots, independent of individual-level and neighborhood risk factors. Results Higher ambient metal exposures were associated with higher odds of residing in breast and colorectal cancer hotspots. Populations in breast and colorectal cancer hotspots were disproportionately Black and had markers of lower socioeconomic status. Furthermore, adjusting for age, race, tobacco and neighborhood factors did not significantly change cancer hotspot ORs for ambient metal exposures analyzed. Conclusion Ambient metal exposures contribute to higher cancer rates in certain geographic areas that are largely composed of marginalized populations. Individual-level assessments of metal exposures and cancer disparities are needed.