Journal Article
The role of methane in future climate strategies: mitigation potentials and climate impacts
Mathijs Harmsen; Detlef P. van Vuuren; Benjamin Leon Bodirsky; Jean Chateau; Olivier Durand-Lasserve; Laurent Drouet; Oliver Fricko; Shinichiro Fujimori; David E. H. J. Gernaat; Tatsuya Hanaoka; Jérôme Hilaire; Kimon Keramidas; Gunnar Luderer; Maria Cecilia P. Moura; Fuminori Sano; Steven J. Smith; Kenichi Wada
Climatic Change · Vol. 163, Issue 3 · pp. 1409-1425 · 2020
Abstract
This study examines model-specific assumptions and projections of methane (CH 4 ) emissions in deep mitigation scenarios generated by integrated assessment models (IAMs). For this, scenarios of nine models are compared in terms of sectoral and regional CH 4 emission reduction strategies, as well as resulting climate impacts. The models’ projected reduction potentials are compared to sector and technology-specific reduction potentials found in literature. Significant cost-effective and non-climate policy related reductions are projected in the reference case (10–36% compared to a “frozen emission factor” scenario in 2100). Still, compared to 2010, CH 4 emissions are expected to rise steadily by 9–72% (up to 412 to 654 Mt CH 4 /year). Ambitious CO 2 reduction measures could by themselves lead to a reduction of CH 4 emissions due to a reduction of fossil fuels (22–48% compared to the reference case in 2100). However, direct CH 4 mitigation is crucial and more effective in bringing down CH 4 (50–74% compared to the reference case). Given the limited reduction potential, agriculture CH 4 emissions are projected to constitute an increasingly larger share of total anthropogenic CH 4 emissions in mitigation scenarios. Enteric fermentation in ruminants is in that respect by far the largest mitigation bottleneck later in the century with a projected 40–78% of total remaining CH 4 emissions in 2100 in a strong (2 °C) climate policy case.