Journal Article
Impact of methane and black carbon mitigation on forcing and temperature: a multi-model scenario analysis
Steven J Smith; Jean Chateau; Kalyn Dorheim; Laurent Drouet; Olivier Durand-Lasserve; Oliver Fricko; Shinichiro Fujimori; Tatsuya Hanaoka; Mathijs Harmsen; Jérôme Hilaire; Kimon Keramidas; Zbigniew Klimont; Gunnar Luderer; Maria Cecilia P. Moura; Keywan Riahi; Joeri Rogelj; Fuminori Sano; Detlef P. van Vuuren; Kenichi Wada
Climatic Change · Vol. 163, Issue 3 · pp. 1427-1442 · 2020
Abstract
The relatively short atmospheric lifetimes of methane (CH 4 ) and black carbon (BC) have focused attention on the potential for reducing anthropogenic climate change by reducing Short-Lived Climate Forcer (SLCF) emissions. This paper examines radiative forcing and global mean temperature results from the Energy Modeling Forum (EMF)-30 multi-model suite of scenarios addressing CH 4 and BC mitigation, the two major short-lived climate forcers. Central estimates of temperature reductions in 2040 from an idealized scenario focused on reductions in methane and black carbon emissions ranged from 0.18–0.26 °C across the nine participating models. Reductions in methane emissions drive 60% or more of these temperature reductions by 2040, although the methane impact also depends on auxiliary reductions that depend on the economic structure of the model. Climate model parameter uncertainty has a large impact on results, with SLCF reductions resulting in as much as 0.3–0.7 °C by 2040. We find that the substantial overlap between a SLCF-focused policy and a stringent and comprehensive climate policy that reduces greenhouse gas emissions means that additional SLCF emission reductions result in, at most, a small additional benefit of ~ 0.1 °C in the 2030–2040 time frame.