NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Implications of 2D versus 3D surveys to measure the abundance and composition of benthic coral reef communities

Niklas A. Kornder; Jose Cappelletto; Benjamin Mueller; Margaretha J. L. Zalm; Stephanie J. Martinez; Mark J. A. Vermeij; Jef Huisman; Jasper M. de Goeij
Coral Reefs · Vol. 40, Issue 4 · pp. 1137-1153 · 2021

Abstract

A paramount challenge in coral reef ecology is to estimate the abundance and composition of the communities residing in such complex ecosystems. Traditional 2D projected surface cover estimates neglect the 3D structure of reefs and reef organisms, overlook communities residing in cryptic reef habitats (e.g., overhangs, cavities), and thus may fail to represent biomass estimates needed to assess trophic ecology and reef function. Here, we surveyed the 3D surface cover, biovolume, and biomass (i.e., ash-free dry weight) of all major benthic taxa on 12 coral reef stations on the island of Curaçao (Southern Caribbean) using structure-from-motion photogrammetry, coral point counts, in situ measurements, and elemental analysis. We then compared our 3D benthic community estimates to corresponding estimates of traditional 2D projected surface cover to explore the differences in benthic community composition using different metrics. Overall, 2D cover was dominated (52 ± 2%, mean ± SE) by non-calcifying phototrophs (macroalgae, turf algae, benthic cyanobacterial mats), but their contribution to total reef biomass was minor (3.2 ± 0.6%). In contrast, coral cover (32 ± 2%) more closely resembled coral biomass (27 ± 6%). The relative contribution of erect organisms, such as gorgonians and massive sponges, to 2D cover was twofold and 11-fold lower, respectively, than their contribution to reef biomass. Cryptic surface area (3.3 ± 0.2 m 2 m −2 planar reef ) comprised half of the total reef substrate, rendering two thirds of coralline algae and almost all encrusting sponges (99.8%) undetected in traditional assessments. Yet, encrusting sponges dominated reef biomass (35 ± 18%). Based on our quantification of exposed and cryptic reef communities using different metrics, we suggest adjustments to current monitoring approaches and highlight ramifications for evaluating the ecological contributions of different taxa to overall reef function. To this end, our metric conversions can complement other benthic assessments to generate non-invasive estimates of the biovolume, biomass, and elemental composition (i.e., standing stocks of organic carbon and nitrogen) of Caribbean coral reef communities.

Bibliographic Information

JournalCoral Reefs
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2021-08-01
Publication Year2021
Volume40
Issue4
Pages1137-1153
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN0722-4028
eISSN1432-0975
DOI10.1007/s00338-021-02118-6

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1982-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/338
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.