Abstract
Herbivorous coral reef fishes are often assigned to different functional groups based on feeding mode and presumed ecosystem processes, such as algal removal ( i.e. , functional herbivory). However, these functional assignments do not necessarily identify assimilated resources nor predict nutritional pathways supporting fish biomass. We used stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes of amino acids to refine our understanding of herbivory among three nominally herbivorous fishes: Chlorurus spilurus , Ctenochaetus striatus , and Naso lituratus . Amino acid carbon isotope fingerprinting indicated much higher and more variable algal carbon contribution for N. lituratus (52.0% [22.0–84.1]) than C. spilurus (5.4% [0.9–17.8]) or C. striatus (4.8% [0.8–15.6]), which were corroborated by low trophic transfer values of N. lituratus ( Δδ 15 N Glu-Lys = 6.0 ± 0.9‰), high source δ 15 N Lys values (4.7 ± 1.0‰), and low microbial reworking ΣV values (0.9 ± 0.2). Conversely, higher Δδ 15 N Glu-Lys values of C. spilurus (7.9 ± 0.9‰) and C. striatus (9.0 ± 1.1‰) coupled with low δ 15 N Lys values (3.6 ± 1.0‰; 3.6 ± 1.1‰, respectively) and higher ΣV values (1.4 ± 0.2; 1.3 ± 0.2, respectively) indicated increased reliance on heterotrophically recycled production ( e.g. , bacteria, detritus, sponge tissue, mucus). Taken together, these data indicate N. lituratus as the most algivorous among our study species, while its broad source credible intervals may reflect epibiont assimilation, algal source variability, or intraspecific dietary variation. By linking carbon source assimilation and trophic transfer at the molecular level, we show that functionally “herbivorous” fishes can occupy distinct nutritional niches and that nutritional and functional definitions of herbivory may not always align.