NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Translational studies of intravenous and intracerebroventricular routes of administration for CNS cellular biodistribution for BMN 250, an enzyme replacement therapy for the treatment of Sanfilippo type B

Anita Grover; Danielle Crippen-Harmon; Lacey Nave; Jon Vincelette; Jill C. M. Wait; Andrew C. Melton; Roger Lawrence; Jillian R. Brown; Katherine A. Webster; Bryan K. Yip; Brian Baridon; Catherine Vitelli; Sara Rigney; Terri M. Christianson; Pascale M. N. Tiger; Melanie J. Lo; John Holtzinger; Adam J. Shaywitz; Brett E. Crawford; Paul A. Fitzpatrick; Jonathan H. LeBowitz; Sherry Bullens; Mika Aoyagi-Scharber; Stuart Bunting; Charles A. O’Neill; Jason Pinkstaff; Anil Bagri
Drug Delivery and Translational Research · Vol. 10, Issue 2 · pp. 425-439 · 2020

Abstract

BMN 250 is being developed as enzyme replacement therapy for Sanfilippo type B, a primarily neurological rare disease, in which patients have deficient lysosomal alpha- N -acetylglucosaminidase (NAGLU) enzyme activity. BMN 250 is taken up in target cells by the cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate receptor (CI-MPR, insulin-like growth factor 2 receptor), which then facilitates transit to the lysosome. BMN 250 is dosed directly into the central nervous system via the intracerebroventricular (ICV) route, and the objective of this work was to compare systemic intravenous (IV) and ICV delivery of BMN 250 to confirm the value of ICV dosing. We first assess the ability of enzyme to cross a potentially compromised blood–brain barrier in the Naglu −/− mouse model and then assess the potential for CI-MPR to be employed for receptor-mediated transport across the blood–brain barrier. In wild-type and Naglu −/− mice, CI-MPR expression in brain vasculature is high during the neonatal period but virtually absent by adolescence. In contrast, CI-MPR remains expressed through adolescence in non-affected non-human primate and human brain vasculature. Combined results from IV administration of BMN 250 in Naglu −/− mice and IV and ICV administration in healthy juvenile non-human primates suggest a limitation to therapeutic benefit from IV administration because enzyme distribution is restricted to brain vascular endothelial cells: enzyme does not reach target neuronal cells following IV administration, and pharmacological response following IV administration is likely restricted to clearance of substrate in endothelial cells. In contrast, ICV administration enables central nervous system enzyme replacement with biodistribution to target cells.

Bibliographic Information

JournalDrug Delivery and Translational Research
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2020-04-01
Publication Year2020
Volume10
Issue2
Pages425-439
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN2190-393X
eISSN2190-3948
DOI10.1007/s13346-019-00683-6

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage2011-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/13346
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.