NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Mucosal administration of lipid nanoparticles containing self-amplifying mRNA induces local uptake and expression in a pig model as a potential vaccination platform against STIs

Ibe Van de Casteele; Magalie Plovyt; Magdalena Stuchlíková; Michiel Lanssens; Ben Verschueren; Quenten Denon; Paul Van der Meeren; Sean McCafferty; Arlieke Gitsels; Pieter Cornillie; Niek N. Sanders; Aster Vandierendonck; Katrien C. K. Poelaert; Daisy Vanrompay
Drug Delivery and Translational Research · Vol. 16, Issue 1 · pp. 330-346 · 2026

Abstract

Mucosal vaccination generates protective immune responses directly at the primary site of STI infection. However, the delivery of nanoparticles is hindered by the mucus barrier at these mucosal surfaces. Due to this interference, research on mucosal administration of self-amplifying (sa)-mRNA encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles (LNP) is currently limited and inconsistent. Some progress has been reported for nasal mRNA vaccination. However, for STIs, protective immune responses are required at the urogenital tract, which is achieved through intravaginal or intranasal administration. Therefore, in this research, we aimed to determine whether an sa-mRNA-LNP reporter vaccine could be effectively administered mucosally, evaluating its potential as a novel platform for STI vaccination. The sa-mRNA luciferase construct was encapsulated in two LNP formulations. In vitro studies demonstrated that these formulations maintained their potency after being sprayed with different sprayers and exposed to different mucus solutions, except for a human cervicovaginal simulant. Next, pigs received 15 µg of the sa-mRNA intravaginally and intranasally through a mucosal spray or injection. The mucosal spray resulted in expression and uptake only at the vaginal mucosa, whereas injection of the formulations resulted in expression at both mucosal sites. However, expression after spraying in the vaginal mucosa disappeared by day 4 post-administration. No differences were observed between both LNP formulations. These findings demonstrate that sa-mRNA can be used for mucosal administration, and expression can be achieved in a more relevant animal model. However, additional research is needed to develop more suitable particles for these complex environments.

Bibliographic Information

JournalDrug Delivery and Translational Research
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2026-01-01
Publication Year2026
Volume16
Issue1
Pages330-346
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN2190-393X
eISSN2190-3948
DOI10.1007/s13346-025-01877-x

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage2011-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/13346
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.