Abstract
Using tagged and recaptured Atlantic salmon Salmo salar (n = 106) the present analysis shows that the most commonly applied linear back‐calculation method for estimating past length, the Dahl‐Lea method, resulted in overestimation of the length of large smolts and underestimation of small smolts. A correction equation ( y = 0.53 x + 6.23) for estimating true smolt length ( y ) from lengths back‐calculated from adult scale measures ( x ) to account for these systematic discrepancies is proposed.