NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Comparative morphology of the electrosensory system of the epaulette shark Hemiscyllium ocellatum and brown‐banded bamboo shark Chiloscyllium punctatum

Arnault R. G. Gauthier; Darryl L. Whitehead; Ian R. Tibbetts; Michael B. Bennett
Journal of Fish Biology · Vol. 94, Issue 2 · pp. 313-319 · 2019

Abstract

We compared the electrosensory system of two benthic elasmobranchs Hemiscyllium ocellatum and Chiloscyllium punctatum . The distribution of the ampullary pores on the head was similar for both species, with a higher density of pores anteriorly and a lower density posteriorly, although C. punctatum generally possessed larger pores. Ampullary canals of the mandibular cluster were quasi‐sinusoidal in H. ocellatum , a shape previously found in benthic rays only, whereas ampullary canals in C. punctatum were of a linear morphology as reported for many shark and ray species previously. The ampullae proper were of the lobular type, as occurs in most galean sharks. Chiloscyllium punctatum had six sensory chambers compared with the five per ampulla in H. ocellatum , which were generally smaller than those of C. punctatum . The sensory epithelium comprised flattened receptor cells, compared with the usual pear‐shaped receptor cells encountered in other elasmobranchs and their apically nucleated supportive cells did not protrude markedly into the ampullary lumen, unlike those in benthic rays.

Bibliographic Information

JournalJournal of Fish Biology
PublisherWiley
Publication Date2019-02-01
Publication Year2019
Volume94
Issue2
Pages313-319
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN0022-1112
eISSN1095-8649
DOI10.1111/jfb.13893
SubjectGeneral Aquaculture, Fisheries & Fish Science

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1997-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/10958649
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.