NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Transgene‐mediated skeletal phenotypic variation in zebrafish

Charles B. Kimmel; Alexander L. Wind; Whitney Oliva; Samuel D. Ahlquist; Charline Walker; John Dowd; Bernardo Blanco‐Sánchez; Tom A. Titus; Peter Batzel; Jared C. Talbot; John H. Postlethwait; James T. Nichols
Journal of Fish Biology · Vol. 98, Issue 4 · pp. 956-970 · 2021

Abstract

When considering relationships between genotype and phenotype we frequently ignore the fact that the genome of a typical animal, notably including that of a fish and a human, harbours a huge amount of foreign DNA. Such DNA, in the form of transposable elements, can affect genome function in a major way, and transgene biology needs to be included in our understanding of the genome. Here we examine an unexpected phenotypic effect of the chromosomally integrated transgene fli1a‐F‐hsp70l:Gal4VP16 that serves as a model for transgene function generally. We examine larval fras1 mutant zebrafish ( Danio rerio ). Gal4VP16 is a potent transcriptional activator that is already well known for toxicity and mediating unusual transcriptional effects. In the presence of the transgene, phenotypes in the neural crest‐derived craniofacial skeleton, notably fusions and shape changes associated with loss of function fras1 mutations, are made more severe, as we quantify by scoring phenotypic penetrance, the fraction of mutants expressing the trait. A very interesting feature is that the enhancements are highly specific for fras1 mutant phenotypes, occurring in the apparent absence of more widespread changes. Except for the features due to the fras1 mutation, the transgene‐bearing larvae appear generally healthy and to be developing normally. The transgene behaves as a genetic partial dominant: a single copy is sufficient for the enhancements, yet, for some traits, two copies may exert a stronger effect. We made new strains bearing independent insertions of the fli1a‐F‐hsp70l:Gal4VP16 transgene in new locations in the genome, and observed increased severities of the same phenotypes as observed for the original insertion. This finding suggests that sequences within the transgene, for example Gal4VP16, are responsible for the enhancements, rather than the effect on neighbouring host sequences (such as an insertional mutation). The specificity and biological action underlying the traits are subjects of considerable interest for further investigation, as we discuss. Our findings show that work with transgenes needs to be undertaken with caution and attention to detail.

Bibliographic Information

JournalJournal of Fish Biology
PublisherWiley
Publication Date2021-04-01
Publication Year2021
Volume98
Issue4
Pages956-970
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN0022-1112
eISSN1095-8649
DOI10.1111/jfb.14300
SubjectGeneral Aquaculture, Fisheries & Fish Science

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1997-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/10958649
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.