NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Who gets prescriptions for proton pump inhibitors and why? A drug-utilization study with claims data in Bavaria, Germany, 2010–2018

Ina-Maria Rückert-Eheberg; Michael Nolde; Nayeon Ahn; Martin Tauscher; Roman Gerlach; Florian Güntner; Alexander Günter; Christa Meisinger; Jakob Linseisen; Ute Amann; Sebastian-Edgar Baumeister
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · Vol. 78, Issue 4 · pp. 657-667 · 2022

Abstract

Purpose The German annual drug prescription-report has indicated overuse of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for many years; however, little was known about the characteristics of people using PPIs. This study aimed to provide comprehensive utilization data and describe frequencies of potential on- and off-label PPI-indications in Bavaria, Germany. Methods Claims data of statutorily insured people from 2010 to 2018 were used. Defined daily doses (DDDs) of PPIs by type of drug, prevalence of PPI-use and DDDs prescribed per 1000 insured people/day were analyzed. For 2018, proportions of users and DDDs per 1000 insured people were calculated by age and sex. To elucidate changes in prescribing practices due to a suspected drug-drug interaction, we examined co-prescribing of clopidogrel and PPIs between 2010 and 2018. For PPI new users, sums of DDDs and frequencies of potential indications were examined. Results PPI prescribing increased linearly from 2010 to 2016 and gradually decreased from 2016 to 2018. In 2018, 14.7% of women and 12.2% of men received at least one prescription, and 64.8 DDDs (WHO-def.) per 1000 insured people/day were prescribed. Overall, omeprazole use decreased over the observation period and was steadily replaced by pantoprazole, especially when co-prescibed with clopidogrel. An on-label PPI-indication was not reported at first intake in 52.0% of new users. Conclusions The utilization of prescribed PPIs has decreased since 2016. However, a large proportion of new PPI-users had no documentation of a potential indication, and the sums of DDDs prescribed often seemed not to comply with guidelines.

Bibliographic Information

JournalEuropean Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2022-04-01
Publication Year2022
Volume78
Issue4
Pages657-667
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN0031-6970
eISSN1432-1041
DOI10.1007/s00228-021-03257-z

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1968-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/228
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.