NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Multilevel allometric modelling of maximum cardiac output, maximum arteriovenous oxygen difference, and peak oxygen uptake in 11–13-year-olds

Neil Armstrong; Jo Welsman
European Journal of Applied Physiology · Vol. 120, Issue 2 · pp. 527-537 · 2020

Abstract

Purposes To investigate longitudinally (1) the contribution of morphological covariates to explaining the development of maximum cardiac output ( $${\dot{\text{Q}}}$$ Q ˙ max) and maximum arteriovenous oxygen difference (a-vO 2 diff max), (2) sex differences in $${\dot{\text{Q}}}$$ Q ˙ max and a-vO 2 diff max once age, maturity status, and morphological covariates have been controlled for, and, (3) the contribution of concurrent changes in morphological and cardiovascular covariates to explaining the sex-specific development of peak oxygen uptake ( $$\dot{{V}}{\mathrm{O}}_{2}$$ V ˙ O 2 ). Methods Fifty-one (32 boys) 11–13-year-olds had their peak $$\dot{{V}}{\mathrm{O}}_{2}$$ V ˙ O 2 , maximum heart rate (HR max), $${\dot{\text{Q}}}$$ Q ˙ max, and a-vO 2 diff max determined during treadmill running on three annual occasions. The data were analysed using multilevel allometric modelling. Results There were no sex differences in HR max which was not significantly ( p > 0.05) correlated with age, morphological variables, or peak $$\dot{{V}}{\mathrm{O}}_{2}$$ V ˙ O 2 . The best-fit models for $${\dot{\text{Q}}}$$ Q ˙ max and a-vO 2 diff max were with fat-free mass (FFM) as covariate with age, maturity status, and haemoglobin concentration not significant ( p > 0.05). FFM was the dominant influence on the development of peak $$\dot{{V}}{\mathrm{O}}_{2}$$ V ˙ O 2 . With FFM controlled for, the introduction of either $${\dot{\text{Q}}}$$ Q ˙ max or a-vO 2 diff max to multilevel models of peak $$\dot{{V}}{\mathrm{O}}_{2}$$ V ˙ O 2 resulted in significant ( p < 0.05) additional contributions to explaining the sex difference. Conclusions (1) With FFM controlled for, there were no sex differences in $${\dot{\text{Q}}}$$ Q ˙ max or a-vO 2 diff max, (2) FFM was the dominant influence on the development of peak $$\dot{{V}}{\mathrm{O}}_{2}$$ V ˙ O 2 , and (3) with FFM and either $${\dot{\text{Q}}}$$ Q ˙ max or a-vO 2 diff max controlled for, there remained an unresolved sex difference of ~ 4% in peak $$\dot{{V}}{\mathrm{O}}_{2} .$$ V ˙ O 2 .

Bibliographic Information

JournalEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2020-02-01
Publication Year2020
Volume120
Issue2
Pages527-537
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN1439-6319
eISSN1439-6327
DOI10.1007/s00421-020-04300-0

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1928-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/421
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.