NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

A novel comparative evaluation of multiplex PCR panels for gastrointestinal pathogen detection: Seegene Allplex™ vs. Luminex NxTAG® in clinical stool samples

Laura Seijas-Pereda; Ana Martín; Raquel Menchero; Carlos Rescalvo-Casas; Marcos Hernando-Gozalo; Juan Cuadros-González; Ramón Pérez-Tanoira
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases · Vol. 44, Issue 6 · pp. 1341-1348 · 2025

Abstract

Purpose Accurate and rapid diagnosis of gastrointestinal infections is essential for effective patient management. This study compared the diagnostic performance of two multiplex PCR panels— the Seegene Allplex™ Gastrointestinal Panels (Seegene, Seoul, Korea) and the Luminex NxTAG ® Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel (Luminex Corporation, Austin, Texas, a Diasorin Company)—in detecting gastrointestinal pathogens from clinical stool samples. Methods A total of 196 stool samples, collected from patients at a Spanish hospital during 2023, were analyzed using both assays through prospective and retrospective approaches. The performance of each test was assessed based on Positive Percentage Agreement (PPA), Negative Percentage Agreement (NPA), and overall agreement. Discrepancies between methods were resolved with a third confirmatory technique when available. Results Both assays demonstrated high overall concordance, with NPA values consistently above 95% and overall Kappa values exceeding 0.8 for most pathogens. The average PPA was greater than 89% for nearly all targets; however, lower agreement was observed for Cryptosporidium spp. (86.6%). Notably, discrepancies were primarily observed for certain pathogens, such as Salmonella spp. and Cryptosporidium spp. , highlighting the diagnostic challenges associated with these targets. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the novel Luminex NxTAG ® panels from Diasorin with the Seegene Allplex™. Both multiplex assays provide rapid and reliable detection of gastrointestinal pathogens, making them valuable tools in clinical diagnostics. Future research should focus on improving detection accuracy for challenging pathogens and expanding target panels to further enhance patient management and reduce disease burden.

Bibliographic Information

JournalEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2025-06-01
Publication Year2025
Volume44
Issue6
Pages1341-1348
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN0934-9723
eISSN1435-4373
DOI10.1007/s10096-025-05098-5

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1982-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/10096
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.