Abstract
Stakeholder perspectives play a crucial role in conservation decisions, particularly for species with complex ecological and social impacts, such as African savanna elephants ( Loxodonta africana ). In a South African protected area experiencing high elephant densities and significant tree loss, we surveyed 170 stakeholders, including conservation managers, property owners, tourists, and tourism personnel. Using a Likert scale and thematic analysis, we evaluated their attitudes towards tree protection, waterhole closures, contraception, and culling to mitigate elephant impacts on large trees. Results showed strong support for waterhole closures and tree protection, particularly among younger conservation managers and property owners, who viewed these methods as effective in dispersing elephant populations and safeguarding valuable trees. Conversely, tourists and younger stakeholders preferred non-lethal strategies like contraception, while conservation managers expressed practical concerns about its feasibility. Culling emerged as the most divisive strategy, supported primarily by older and male stakeholders in conservation but largely opposed by tourists due to ethical concerns. The chord diagram illustrated distinct patterns, with conservation managers aligning more with waterhole closures and culling, while property owners and tourists favoured tree protection and contraception. These findings highlight the diversity in stakeholder values, shaped by demographic factors, and underscore the need for adaptive, context-specific management strategies. Our study provides a framework for conservation policies that balance ecological objectives with social acceptability, promoting sustainable coexistence between elephants, large trees, and diverse stakeholder interests.