Abstract
Although nutrients and grazing both contribute to the formation of harmful algal blooms, research on these events has rarely considered both factors simultaneously. To ascertain the impact of nutrients and grazing on brown tides of Aureococcus anophagefferens , nutrient bioassays were conducted in parallel with dilution‐style microzooplankton grazing experiments during an intense bloom that occurred throughout Great South Bay (GSB), New York, in fall of 1999. During the study, Aureococcus represented between 25 and 85% of phytoplankton biomass and attained peak cell densities > 6 × 10 5 cells ml −1 . Concentrations of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and nitrogen (DON) in GSB were high (mean = 430 µM and 32 µM, respectively) during the bloom, while dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) levels were low (mean = 2.5 µM). Although the experimental additions of nitrogen (nitrate or urea) typically enhanced the growth rates of the non‐brown tide phytoplankton community, such additions often had no impact on, or decreased, growth rates of Aureococcus relative to unamended control treatments. These observations suggest that growth of non‐brown tide phytoplankton depended on ambient N supply rates, while Aureococcus experienced nutrient replete growth. Dilution experiments indicated that microzooplankton grazing rates on A. anophagefferens were significantly lower than those on other algal populations. This reduced grazing pressure contributed toward higher net growth rates for Aureococcus relative to non‐brown tide phytoplankton. In sum, these results demonstrate that both top‐down (low grazing mortality rates) and bottom‐up (a high DOC/DON, low DIN nutrient regime) factors can contribute to the proliferation of brown tide blooms in New York waters.