NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Your brain doesn’t look a day past 70! Cross-sectional associations with brain-predicted age in the cognitively-intact oldest-old

Mark K. Britton; Hannah Hoogerwoerd; Joshua Juhasz; Keyanni Joy Johnson; Paul D. Stewart; Pradyumna K. Bharadwaj; Stacy S. Merritt; Cortney J. Jessup; Clinton B. Wright; G. Alex Hishaw; David A. Raichlen; Victor A. Del Bene; Virginia G. Wadley; Theodore P. Trouard; Noam Alperin; Bonnie E. Levin; Tatjana Rundek; Kristina M. Visscher; Gene E. Alexander; Ronald A. Cohen; Eric C. Porges; Joseph M. Gullett
GeroScience · 2025

Abstract

The cognitively-intact oldest-old (85 +) may be the most-resilient members of their birth cohort; due to survivorship effects (e.g., depletion of susceptibles), risk factors associated with brain aging biomarkers in younger samples may not generalize to the cognitively-intact oldest-old. We evaluated associations between established aging-related risk factors and brain-predicted age difference (brainPAD) in a cross-sectional cognitively-intact oldest-old sample. Additionally, we evaluated brainPAD-cognition associations to characterize brain maintenance vs. cognitive reserve in our sample. Oldest-old adults (N = 206; 85–99 years; Montreal Cognitive Assessment > 22 or neurologist evaluation) underwent T1-weighted MRI; brainPAD was generated with brainageR, such that more-positive brainPAD reflected more-advanced brain aging. Sex, education, alcohol and smoking history, exercise history, BMI, cardiovascular and metabolic disease history, and anticholinergic medication burden were self-reported. Global cognitive z-score and coefficient of variation were derived from the UDS 3.0 cognitive battery; crystallized-fluid discrepancy was derived from the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery. Mean brainPAD was -7.99 (SD: 5.37; range: -24.50, 6.03). Women showed more-delayed brain aging than men (B = -2.9, 95% CI = -4.6, -1.1, p = 0.002). No other exposures were significantly associated with brainPAD. BrainPAD was not associated with any cognitive variable. These findings suggest that cognitively-intact oldest-old adults may be atypically-resistant to risk factors associated with aging in younger samples, consistent with survivorship effects in aging. Furthermore, brainPAD may have limited explanatory value for cognitive performance in cognitively-intact oldest-old adults, potentially due to high cognitive reserve. Overall, our findings highlight the impact of survivorship effects on brain aging research. Graphical Abstract

Bibliographic Information

JournalGeroScience
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2025-12-11
Publication Year2025
Document TypeJournal Article
eISSN2509-2723
DOI10.1007/s11357-025-02027-4

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1978-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/11357
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.