NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Optimizing antiphospholipid antibody testing: a real-world analysis of appropriateness and resource utilization

Silvia Grazietta Foddai; Maria Infantino; Mariangela Manfredi; Francesca Pavia; Maurizio Benucci; Francesca Li Gobbi; Massimo Radin; Irene Cecchi; Alice Barinotti; Savino Sciascia
Immunologic Research · Vol. 73, Issue 1 · 2025

Abstract

Efficient utilization of healthcare resources, including laboratory testing, is crucial for environmental sustainability and cost-effectiveness. The diagnosis of APS requires the presence of at least one clinical event (either an objectively confirmed thrombotic event and/or pregnancy complication) and detection of one or more aPL (lupus anticoagulant [LA], IgG/IgM anticardiolipin [aCL], and/or IgG/IgM anti-β2 glycoprotein-1 [aβ2GPI]). However, inappropriate requests for aPL tests contribute to unnecessary healthcare expenses and environmental impact. This study evaluates the appropriateness of aPL testing in a clinical setting. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 642 patients attending the San Giovanni Di Dio Hospital, Florence (11/2023–02/2024). Diagnostic suspicion underlying aPL test requests were classified as appropriate, inappropriate, or unevaluable using a scoring system based on clinical recommendations. Appropriateness assessment was performed independently by two researchers and reconciled with a third expert. Patient demographics, test results, and the specialty of the physicians ordering aPL were recorded and analyzed. Of the 642 queries, 36% were deemed appropriate, 42% inappropriate, and 22% unevaluable. Family physicians accounted for 53% of all test requests but exhibited the highest rate of inappropriate requests (44%). Rheumatologists, internal medicine physicians, and gynecologists demonstrated better adherence to recommendations (with 34%, 30%, and 18% of inappropriate requests, respectively). Only 4.9% of patients underwent comprehensive aPL testing per international standards (Sidney criteria). Among the 115 aPL-positive cases, multiple antibody positivity was more common in appropriate test requests. Inappropriate requests often stemmed from conditions without established links to APS, such as alopecia, hypercholesterolemia, and dysmenorrhea. A considerable proportion of aPL testing in routine practice lacks clinical justification, reflecting variability in guideline adherence across specialties. Inappropriate testing increases healthcare costs, specialist referrals, and environmental burdens. Improved education, adherence to diagnostic recommendations, and sustainable practices are critical to optimizing APS testing and resource utilization.

Bibliographic Information

JournalImmunologic Research
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2025-12-01
Publication Year2025
Volume73
Issue1
Document TypeJournal Article
eISSN1559-0755
DOI10.1007/s12026-025-09682-x

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1982-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/12026
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.