NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

CAGI6 ID panel challenge: assessment of phenotype and variant predictions in 415 children with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs)

Maria Cristina Aspromonte; Alessio Del Conte; Shaowen Zhu; Wuwei Tan; Yang Shen; Yexian Zhang; Qi Li; Maggie Haitian Wang; Giulia Babbi; Samuele Bovo; Pier Luigi Martelli; Rita Casadio; Azza Althagafi; Sumyyah Toonsi; Maxat Kulmanov; Robert Hoehndorf; Panagiotis Katsonis; Amanda Williams; Olivier Lichtarge; Su Xian; Wesley Surento; Vikas Pejaver; Sean D. Mooney; Uma Sunderam; Rajgopal Srinivasan; Alessandra Murgia; Damiano Piovesan; Silvio C. E. Tosatto; Emanuela Leonardi
Human Genetics · Vol. 144, Issue 2-3 · pp. 227-242 · 2025

Abstract

The Genetics of Neurodevelopmental Disorders Lab in Padua provided a new intellectual disability (ID) Panel challenge for computational methods to predict patient phenotypes and their causal variants in the context of the Critical Assessment of the Genome Interpretation, 6th edition (CAGI6). Eight research teams submitted a total of 30 models to predict phenotypes based on the sequences of 74 genes (VCF format) in 415 pediatric patients affected by Neurodevelopmental Disorders (NDDs). NDDs are clinically and genetically heterogeneous conditions, with onset in infant age. Here, we assess the ability and accuracy of computational methods to predict comorbid phenotypes based on clinical features described in each patient and their causal variants. We also evaluated predictions for possible genetic causes in patients without a clear genetic diagnosis. Like the previous ID Panel challenge in CAGI5, seven clinical features (ID, ASD, ataxia, epilepsy, microcephaly, macrocephaly, hypotonia), and variants (Pathogenic/Likely Pathogenic, Variants of Uncertain Significance and Risk Factors) were provided. The phenotypic traits and variant data of 150 patients from the CAGI5 ID Panel Challenge were provided as training set for predictors. The CAGI6 challenge confirms CAGI5 results that predicting phenotypes from gene panel data is highly challenging, with AUC values close to random, and no method able to predict relevant variants with both high accuracy and precision. However, a significant improvement is noted for the best method, with recall increasing from 66% to 82%. Several groups also successfully predicted difficult-to-detect variants, emphasizing the importance of variants initially excluded by the Padua NDD Lab.

Bibliographic Information

JournalHuman Genetics
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2025-03-01
Publication Year2025
Volume144
Issue2-3
Pages227-242
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN0340-6717
eISSN1432-1203
DOI10.1007/s00439-024-02722-w

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1964-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/439
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.