NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Working from home, quality of life, and perceived productivity during the first 50-day COVID-19 mitigation measures in Austria: a cross-sectional study

Jakob Weitzer; Kyriaki Papantoniou; Stefan Seidel; Gerhard Klösch; Guido Caniglia; Manfred Laubichler; Martin Bertau; Brenda M. Birmann; Carlo C. Jäger; Lukas Zenk; Gerald Steiner; Eva Schernhammer
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health · Vol. 94, Issue 8 · pp. 1823-1837 · 2021

Abstract

Objectives To explore changes in quality of life and perceived productivity, focusing on the effects of working from home during the first COVID-19 50-day mitigation period in Austria. Methods We conducted an Austrian-representative online survey ( N = 1010) of self-reported life- and work-related changes during the first COVID-19 50-day mitigation period (March 16 through May 1 2020) compared to the situation before. We used multinominal logistic regression models to identify correlates of improved/decreased quality of life in the entire sample, and of improved/decreased productivity in a subsample of the working population ( N = 686). We also calculated age- and multivariable-adjusted ORs and 95% CIs of an improved/decreased quality of life and an improved/decreased productivity by work from home status. Results During the COVID-19 mitigation period, quality of life improved in 17.5%, but decreased in 20.7% of the general Austrian population; perceived productivity at work increased in 12.7%, but decreased in 30.2% of the working population. Working from home during the mitigation period was associated with an increased quality of life (vs. none, partially: OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.09–3.91; all the time: 3.69, 1.86–7.29). In contrast, perceived productivity seemed to decrease when people worked from home (vs. none, partially: 1.42, 0.86–2.35; all the time: 1.48, 0.85–2.58). Working from home and related benefits were not equally distributed among gender, age, and educational attainment. Conclusions A transition to more flexibility of workplace and working hours for employees could have important positive consequences for family and professional life, for stakeholders, for public health, and ultimately for the environment.

Bibliographic Information

JournalInternational Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2021-11-01
Publication Year2021
Volume94
Issue8
Pages1823-1837
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN0340-0131
eISSN1432-1246
DOI10.1007/s00420-021-01692-0

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1930-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/420
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.