NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Predicting prolonged work absence due to musculoskeletal disorders: development, validation, and clinical usefulness of prognostic prediction models

Tarjei Rysstad; Margreth Grotle; Adrian C. Traeger; Lene Aasdahl; Ørjan Nesse Vigdal; Fiona Aanesen; Britt Elin Øiestad; Are Hugo Pripp; Gwenllian Wynne-Jones; Kate M. Dunn; Egil A. Fors; Steven J. Linton; Anne Therese Tveter
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health · Vol. 98, Issue 4-5 · pp. 385-397 · 2025

Abstract

Purpose Given the lack of robust prognostic models for early identification of individuals at risk of work disability, this study aimed to develop and externally validate three models for prolonged work absence among individuals on sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders. Methods We developed three multivariable logistic regression models using data from 934 individuals on sick leave for 4–12 weeks due to musculoskeletal disorders, recruited through the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration. The models predicted three outcomes: (1) > 90 consecutive sick days, (2) > 180 consecutive sick days, and (3) any new or increased work assessment allowance or disability pension within 12 months. Each model was externally validated in a separate cohort of participants (8–12 weeks of sick leave) from a different geographical region in Norway. We evaluated model performance using discrimination ( c -statistic), calibration, and assessed clinical usefulness using decision curve analysis (net benefit). Bootstrapping was used to adjust for overoptimism. Results All three models showed good predictive performance in the external validation sample, with c -statistics exceeding 0.76. The model predicting > 180 days performed best, demonstrating good calibration and discrimination ( c -statistic 0.79 (95% CI 0.73–0.85), and providing net benefit across a range of decision thresholds from 0.10 to 0.80. Conclusions These models, particularly the one predicting > 180 days, may facilitate secondary prevention strategies and guide future clinical trials. Further validation and refinement are necessary to optimise the models and to test their performance in larger samples.

Bibliographic Information

JournalInternational Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2025-07-01
Publication Year2025
Volume98
Issue4-5
Pages385-397
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN0340-0131
eISSN1432-1246
DOI10.1007/s00420-025-02129-8

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1930-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/420
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.