NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

A comparison of image and observer based aerial surveys of narwhal

Koen C. A. Bröker; Rikke G. Hansen; Kathleen E. Leonard; William R. Koski; Mads Peter Heide‐Jørgensen
Marine Mammal Science · Vol. 35, Issue 4 · pp. 1253-1279 · 2019

Abstract

From 25 to 30 August 2014 a double‐observer line‐transect survey was conducted over Melville Bay, home to one of two summering populations of narwhal ( Monodon monoceros ) off West Greenland. A total of 1,932 linear kilometers was surveyed along 33 transects. In addition to using observers, the aircraft was equipped with two oblique cameras to capture a comparable data set. Analysts reviewed the images for narwhal sightings, which were then matched to the observer sightings. The objectives of the study were to determine advantages and disadvantages of the detection capabilities of both methodologies, and to conduct a comparative analysis of population abundance estimates. Correcting for the truncated detection distance of the images (500 m), the image analysts recorded more sightings (62) and a lower mean group size (2.2) compared to aerial observers (36 and 3.5, respectively), resulting in comparable numbers of individuals detected by both platforms (135 vs . 126). The abundance estimate based on the image sightings was 2,536 (CV = 0.51, 95% CI: 1,003–6,406), which was not significantly different from the aerial observers estimate of 2,596 individuals (CV = 0.51; 95% CI: 961–7,008). This study supports the potential of using UAS for marine mammal abundance studies.

Bibliographic Information

JournalMarine Mammal Science
PublisherWiley
Publication Date2019-10-01
Publication Year2019
Volume35
Issue4
Pages1253-1279
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN0824-0469
eISSN1748-7692
DOI10.1111/mms.12586
SubjectMarine Biology

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1997-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/17487692
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.