Abstract
Zero-valent iron has been used for more than 130 years for water treatment. It is based on redox reactions as well as on sorption to the corrosion products of iron. It is successfully applied for the removal of metals and organic pollutants from groundwater and wastewater. There are different variations how zero-valent iron can be used, especially (i) permeable reactive barriers, (ii) fluidized bed reactors and (iii) nanoscale zero-valent iron. Permeable reactive barriers are used for in situ treatment of groundwater in trench-like constructions or in a funnel and gate system. Their advantages are low maintenance cost, inexpensive construction and prevention of excavation wastes, and their disadvantages are surface passivation and clogging of pores by corrosion products. Zero-valent iron nanoparticles are injected directly in contaminated soil or groundwater. Their advantages are a higher reactivity than coarse-grained zero-valent iron and their mobility in the subsurface to reach the contaminated areas. However, they also have some major disadvantages like fast ageing in the system, phytotoxicity, agglomeration during migration and high costs. The latest development is a fluidized bed process (“ferrodecont process”) which avoids the passivation and clogging observed in permeable reactive barriers as well as the high costs and toxicity issues of nanoscale zero-valent iron. First results of this technology for Cr(VI) and organically contaminated groundwaters and metal removal from industrial wastewaters are highly promising.