NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Plucked hair samples as a source of DNA: reliability of dinucleotide microsatellite genotyping

B. GOOSSENS; L. P. WAITS; P. TABERLET
Molecular Ecology · Vol. 7, Issue 9 · pp. 1237-1241 · 1998

Abstract

To test whether plucked hairs are a reliable source of DNA for genotyping microsatellite loci, we carried out experiments using one, three, or 10 hairs per extract for 50 alpine marmots. For each extract, seven independent genotypings were performed for the same locus (multiple‐tubes approach). Two types of genotyping errors were recorded: a false homozygote defined as the detection of only one allele of a true heterozygote, and a false allele defined as a PCR‐generated allele that was not one of the alleles of the true genotype. Using DNA extracted from one, three, or 10 hairs, the overall error rate was 14.00%, 4.86%, and 0.29%, respectively. Based on our results, we conclude that 10 hairs should be used to obtain consistently reliable genotypings using the single‐tube approach, and that a single plucked hair could represent a reliable source of DNA if the multiple‐tubes approach is used. For future studies of dinucleotide repeat diversity using DNA extracted from one to three shed or plucked hairs, we strongly recommend initiating an appropriate pilot study to quantify the error rate and to determine the reliability of the single‐tube approach.

Bibliographic Information

JournalMolecular Ecology
PublisherWiley
Publication Date1998-09-01
Publication Year1998
Volume7
Issue9
Pages1237-1241
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN0962-1083
eISSN1365-294X
DOI10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00407.x
SubjectEcology & Organismal Biology

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1997-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/1365294X
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.