NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Proxy patients’ perceptions of genetic counselor empathy responses

Jennine Bouchard; Ian MacFarlane; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Janice A Baker; Krista Redlinger-Grosse
Journal of Community Genetics · Vol. 17, Issue 3 · 2026

Abstract

Empathy, the ability to understand and communicate another’s experience to them, positively affects genetic counseling processes and outcomes. Genetic counseling, a specialty healthcare profession, provides education and support for those impacted by genetic disease; thus, empathy is critical. Limited studies have explored patients’ perceptions of genetic counselor (GC) empathy responses. This study investigated the types of GC responses proxy patients perceived as most empathic and why. Female MTurk workers ( n = 198) completed a survey containing two hypothetical genetic counseling scenarios (Fabry disease; postnatal diagnosis of cleft lip and palate) that ended with a patient statement followed by five different GC responses. Participants were asked to identify the GC response that best conveyed empathy and explain their choice. Every GC response was selected by at least one participant. Inductive content analysis of participants’ rationales yielded six categories: Understanding , Problem Solving , Sympathizing , Focusing on the Patient , Validating , and Miscellaneous. Understanding was the most prevalent rationale for both scenarios (~ 50% each). While GC responses containing the words “I’m sorry…” were chosen most often for both scenarios (~ 45% each), Sympathizing was the rationale for only ~ 20% of these GC responses. Logistic regression analyses showed significant predictors varied across scenarios and between rationales, with few significant demographic predictors. Participants differed in preferences for empathy statements and rationales, signaling context and tailoring are important when considering empathy. Patient demographics are not recommended in predicting the type of GC patients may find empathic. Ongoing assessment of patients’ feelings and needs (empathic resonance) will allow genetic counselors to tailor their empathy communication (expressed empathy) accordingly.

Bibliographic Information

JournalJournal of Community Genetics
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2026-06-12
Publication Year2026
Volume17
Issue3
Document TypeJournal Article
eISSN1868-6001
DOI10.1007/s12687-026-00909-4

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage2010-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/12687
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.