NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Contribution of warm habitat to cold‐water fisheries

Nick Hahlbeck; William R. Tinniswood; Matthew R. Sloat; Jordan D. Ortega; Matthew A. Wyatt; Mark E. Hereford; Ben S. Ramirez; David A. Crook; Kara J. Anlauf‐Dunn; Jonathan B. Armstrong
Conservation Biology · Vol. 36, Issue 3 · 2022

Abstract

A central tenet of landscape ecology is that mobile species depend on complementary habitats, which are insufficient in isolation, but combine to support animals through the full annual cycle. However, incorporating the dynamic needs of mobile species into conservation strategies remains a challenge, particularly in the context of climate adaptation planning. For cold‐water fishes, it is widely assumed that maximum temperatures are limiting and that summer data alone can predict refugia and population persistence. We tested these assumptions in populations of redband rainbow trout ( Oncorhynchus mykiss newberrii ) in an arid basin, where the dominance of hot, hyperproductive water in summer emulates threats of climate change predicted for cold‐water fish in other basins. We used telemetry to reveal seasonal patterns of movement and habitat use. Then, we compared contributions of hot and cool water to growth with empirical indicators of diet and condition (gut contents, weight–length ratios, electric phase angle, and stable isotope signatures) and a bioenergetics model. During summer, trout occurred only in cool tributaries or springs ( 25 °C). During spring and fall, ≥65% of trout migrated to the lake (5–50 km) to forage. Spring and fall growth (mean [SD] 0.58% per day [0.80%] and 0.34 per day [0.55%], respectively) compensated for a net loss of energy in cool summer refuges (–0.56% per day [0.55%]). In winter, ≥90% of trout returned to tributaries (25–150 km) to spawn. Thus, although perennially cool tributaries supported thermal refuge and spawning, foraging opportunities in the seasonally hot lake ultimately fueled these behaviors. Current approaches to climate adaptation would prioritize the tributaries for conservation but would devalue critical foraging habitat because the lake is unsuitable and unoccupied during summer. Our results empirically demonstrate that warm water can fuel cold‐water fisheries and challenge the common practice of identifying refugia based only on summer conditions.

Bibliographic Information

JournalConservation Biology
PublisherWiley
Publication Date2022-06-01
Publication Year2022
Volume36
Issue3
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN0888-8892
eISSN1523-1739
DOI10.1111/cobi.13857
SubjectConservation Science

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1997-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/15231739
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.