NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Fast Carbon Footprinting for Large Product Portfolios

Christoph J. Meinrenken; Scott M. Kaufman; Siddharth Ramesh; Klaus S. Lackner
Journal of Industrial Ecology · Vol. 16, Issue 5 · pp. 669-679 · 2012

Abstract

Summary Publicly Available Specification 2050‐2011 (PAS 2050), the Green House Gas Product Protocol (GHGPP) standard and forthcoming guideline 14067 from the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) have helped to propel carbon footprinting from a subdiscipline of life cycle assessment (LCA) to the mainstream. However, application of carbon footprinting to large portfolios of many distinct products and services is immensely resource intensive. Even if achieved, it often fails to inform company‐wide carbon reduction strategies because footprint data are disjointed or don't cover the whole portfolio. We introduce a novel approach to generate standard‐compliant product carbon footprints (CFs) for companies with large portfolios at a fraction of previously required time and expertise. The approach was developed and validated on an LCA dataset covering 1,137 individual products from a global packaged consumer goods company. Three novel techniques work in concert in a single approach that enables practitioners to calculate thousands of footprints virtually simultaneously: (i) a uniform data structure enables footprinting all products and services by looping the same algorithm; (ii) concurrent uncertainty analysis guides practitioners to gradually improve the accuracy of only those data that materially impact the results; and (iii) a predictive model generates estimated emission factors (EFs) for materials, thereby eliminating the manual mapping of a product or service's inventory to EF databases. These autogenerated EFs enable non‐LCA experts to calculate approximate CFs and alleviate resource constraints for companies embarking on large‐scale product carbon footprinting. We discuss implementation roadmaps for companies, including further road‐testing required to evaluate the effectiveness of the approach for other product portfolios, limitations, and future improvements of the fast footprinting methodology.

Bibliographic Information

JournalJournal of Industrial Ecology
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2012-10-01
Publication Year2012
Volume16
Issue5
Pages669-679
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN1088-1980
eISSN1530-9290
DOI10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00463.x

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1997-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/44498
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.