Abstract
This paper focuses on the retrieval of refractivity fields from GNSS measurements by means of least-squares collocation. Collocation adjustment estimates parameters that relate delays and refractivity without relying on a grid. It contains functional and stochastic models that define the characteristics of the retrieved refractivity fields. This work aims at emphasizing the capabilities and limitations of the collocation method in modeling refractivity and to present it as a valuable alternative to GNSS tomography. Initially, we analyze the stochastic models in collocation and compare the theoretical errors of collocation with those of tomography. We emphasize the low variability of collocation formal variances/covariances compared to tomography and its lower dependence on a-priori fields. Then, based on real and simulated data, we investigate the importance of station resolution and station heights for collocation. Increasing the network resolution, for example, from 10 to 2 km, results in improved a-posteriori statistics, including a 10% reduction in the error statistic for the retrieved refractivity up to 6 km. In addition, using additional stations at higher altitudes has an impact on the retrieved refractivity fields of about 1 ppm in terms of standard deviation up to 6 km, and a bias reduction of more than 3 ppm up to 3 km. Furthermore, we compare refractivity fields retrieved through tomography and collocation, where data of the COSMO weather model are utilized in a closed-loop validation mode to simulate tropospheric delays and validate the retrieved profiles. While tomography estimates are less biased, collocation captures relative changes in refractivity more effectively among the voxels within one height level. Finally, we apply tomography and collocation to test their capabilities to detect an approaching weather front. Both methods can sense the weather front, but their atmospheric structures appear more similar when the GNSS network has a well-distributed height coverage.