NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Recommendations for utilizing and reporting population genetic analyses: the reproducibility of genetic clustering using the program structure

Kimberly J. Gilbert; Rose L. Andrew; Dan G. Bock; Michelle T. Franklin; Nolan C. Kane; Jean‐Sébastien Moore; Brook T. Moyers; Sébastien Renaut; Diana J. Rennison; Thor Veen; Timothy H. Vines
Molecular Ecology · Vol. 21, Issue 20 · pp. 4925-4930 · 2012

Abstract

Reproducibility is the benchmark for results and conclusions drawn from scientific studies, but systematic studies on the reproducibility of scientific results are surprisingly rare. Moreover, many modern statistical methods make use of ‘random walk’ model fitting procedures, and these are inherently stochastic in their output. Does the combination of these statistical procedures and current standards of data archiving and method reporting permit the reproduction of the authors' results? To test this, we reanalysed data sets gathered from papers using the software package structure to identify genetically similar clusters of individuals. We find that reproducing structure results can be difficult despite the straightforward requirements of the program. Our results indicate that 30% of analyses were unable to reproduce the same number of population clusters. To improve this, we make recommendations for future use of the software and for reporting structure analyses and results in published works.

Bibliographic Information

JournalMolecular Ecology
PublisherWiley
Publication Date2012-10-01
Publication Year2012
Volume21
Issue20
Pages4925-4930
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN0962-1083
eISSN1365-294X
DOI10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05754.x
SubjectEcology & Organismal Biology

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1997-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/1365294X
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.