NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Genome‐wide differentiation in closely related populations: the roles of selection and geographic isolation

R. J. Safran; E. S. C. Scordato; M. R. Wilkins; J. K. Hubbard; B. R. Jenkins; T. Albrecht; S. M. Flaxman; H. Karaardıç; Y. Vortman; A. Lotem; P. Nosil; P. Pap; S. Shen; S.‐F. Chan; T.L. Parchman; N. C. Kane
Molecular Ecology · Vol. 25, Issue 16 · pp. 3865-3883 · 2016

Abstract

Population divergence in geographic isolation is due to a combination of factors. Natural and sexual selection may be important in shaping patterns of population differentiation, a pattern referred to as ‘isolation by adaptation’ ( IBA ). IBA can be complementary to the well‐known pattern of ‘isolation by distance’ ( IBD ), in which the divergence of closely related populations (via any evolutionary process) is associated with geographic isolation. The barn swallow Hirundo rustica complex comprises six closely related subspecies, where divergent sexual selection is associated with phenotypic differentiation among allopatric populations. To investigate the relative contributions of selection and geographic distance to genome‐wide differentiation, we compared genotypic and phenotypic variation from 350 barn swallows sampled across eight populations (28 pairwise comparisons) from four different subspecies. We report a draft whole‐genome sequence for H. rustica , to which we aligned a set of 9493 single nucleotide polymorphisms ( SNP s). Using statistical approaches to control for spatial autocorrelation of phenotypic variables and geographic distance, we find that divergence in traits related to migratory behaviour and sexual signalling, as well as geographic distance, together explain over 70% of genome‐wide divergence among populations. Controlling for IBD , we find 42% of genomewide divergence is attributable to IBA through pairwise differences in traits related to migratory behaviour and sexual signalling alone. By (i) combining these results with prior studies of how selection shapes morphological differentiation and (ii) accounting for spatial autocorrelation, we infer that morphological adaptation plays a large role in shaping population‐level differentiation in this group of closely related populations.

Bibliographic Information

JournalMolecular Ecology
PublisherWiley
Publication Date2016-08-01
Publication Year2016
Volume25
Issue16
Pages3865-3883
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN0962-1083
eISSN1365-294X
DOI10.1111/mec.13740
SubjectEcology & Organismal Biology

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage1997-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/1365294X
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.