Abstract
The question of whether spatial aspects of evolution differ in marine versus terrestrial realms has endured since Ernst Mayr's 1954 essay on marine speciation. Marine systems are often suggested to support larger and more highly connected populations, but quantitative comparisons with terrestrial systems have been lacking. Here, we compared the population histories of marine and terrestrial elapid snakes using the pairwise sequentially Markovian coalescent (PSMC) model to track historical fluctuations in species’ effective population sizes ( N e ) from individual whole‐genome sequences. To do this we generated a draft genome for the olive sea snake ( Aiysurus laevis ) and analysed this alongside six published elapid genomes and their sequence reads (marine species Hydrophis curtus , H. melanocephalus and Laticauda laticaudata ; terrestrial species Pseudonaja textilis, Naja Naja and Notechis scutatus ). Counter to the expectation that marine species should show higher overall N e and less pronounced fluctuations in N e , our analyses reveal demographic patterns that are highly variable among species and do not clearly correspond to major ecological divisions. At deeper time intervals, the four marine elapids appear to have experienced relatively stable N e , while each terrestrial species shows a prominent upturn in N e starting at ~4 million years ago (Ma) followed by an equally strong decline. However, over the last million years, all seven species show strong and divergent fluctuations. Estimates of N e in the most recent intervals (~10 kya) are lowest in two of four marine species ( H. melanocephalus and Laticauda ), and do not correspond to contemporary range sizes in marine or terrestrial taxa.