Abstract
Synteny, the ordering of sequences within homologous chromosomes, must be maintained within the genomes of sexually reproducing species for the sharing of alleles and production of viable, reproducing offspring. However, when the genomes of closely related species are compared, a loss of synteny is often observed. Unequal homologous recombination is the primary mechanism behind synteny loss, occurring more often in transposon rich regions, and resulting in the formation of chromosomal rearrangements. To examine patterns of synteny among three closely related, interbreeding, and wild Eucalyptus species, we assembled their genomes using long‐read DNA sequencing and de novo assembly. We identify syntenic and rearranged regions between these genomes and estimate that ~48% of our genomes remain syntenic while ~36% is rearranged. We observed that rearrangements highly fragment microsynteny. Our results suggest that synteny between these species is primarily lost through small‐scale rearrangements, not through sequence loss, gain, or sequence divergence. Further examination of identified rearrangements suggests that rearrangements may be altering the phenotypes of Eucalyptus species. Our study also underscores that the use of single reference genomes in genomic variation studies could lead to reference bias, especially given the scale at which we show potentially adaptive loci have highly diverged, deleted, duplicated and/or rearranged. This study provides an unbiased framework to look at potential speciation and adaptive loci among a rapidly radiating foundation species of woodland trees that are free from selective breeding seen in most crop species.