NARA Discovery
Article Details
← Back to Search Results
Journal Article

Evaluating uncertainties with sample-collection method and source selection in sediment fingerprinting: an example from a Great Lakes tributary

Tanja N. Williamson; James D. Blount; Heidi M. Broerman; Faith A. Fitzpatrick; Isaac J. Mevis; Dayle J. Hoefling; Shannon M. Pace; Matthew J. Komiskey; Rebecca M. Kreiling
Journal of Soils and Sediments · Vol. 25, Issue 12 · pp. 4140-4163 · 2025

Abstract

Purpose Identifying suspended-sediment (SS) sources, seasonal variability, and phosphorus (P) transported with SS is critical information for basin managers, although there may be concerns about comparability between flow-integrated SS samples used for sediment fingerprinting and discrete samples used for concentrations and loads in basins where SS is mostly silt + clay and(or) one land-use predominates. Objectives were to determine if (1) sample-collection method and (2) source consideration influenced apportionment of the largest SS source. Methods Concurrent-replicate, SS samples were collected during 2022 from the East River, Wisconsin using an automated sampler, commonly used for water-quality sampling, and passive samplers, frequently used for SS fingerprinting. Samples were evaluated for differences in physical and chemical characteristics that may affect source apportionment. Considered sources included three upland land-use (cropland, forest, and roads), two in-channel (streambank and streambed sediment), and one that connects uplands to the stream channel (gullies). Source apportionment used established methods in the SedSAT tool. Source scenarios included land-use + streambank (4src), 4src + gully, 4src + streambed, and 4src + gully + streambed (6src). Results There were no statistically significant differences in median grain size, organic carbon, or sediment-bound P as a function of collection method. In-channel sources were the largest proportional SS source, regardless of season, hydrologic condition, collection method, or source scenario. Source verification highlighted which source fingerprints were most accurately defined and implications for SS target apportionment. Conclusion Varying the source scenarios for sediment fingerprinting indicated that improved management of hydrologic connectivity between upland land use and the stream channel has the potential to mitigate SS loads.

Bibliographic Information

JournalJournal of Soils and Sediments
PublisherSpringer
Publication Date2025-12-01
Publication Year2025
Volume25
Issue12
Pages4140-4163
Document TypeJournal Article
Print ISSN1439-0108
eISSN1614-7480
DOI10.1007/s11368-025-04155-y

Access Information

NARA Access Coverage2001-01-01~Current
Journal Homepagehttps://www.springer.com/journal/11368
Publisher PageOpen Publisher Page
Full-text access depends on NARA's subscribed coverage and institutional access.