Sampling microbial dynamics in the Salish Sea estuary: evaluating methods to capture cyanobacteria and cyanophage - Noelani R. Boise; Owen P. Leiser; Kristin Jones; Mahala Peter-Frank; Damon Leach; Stephen Crafton-Tempel; Peter Regier; Ruonan Wu; Conner Phillips; Margaret S. Cheung; Connah G. M. Johnson; Scott J. Edmundson; et al. (Frontiers in Marine Science, 2026)
Introduction Picocyanobacteria from the genera Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus thrive across the globe in aquatic environments, have relatively small genomes, and have growth dynamics regulated by both viral interactions and abiotic conditions, making them excellent model organisms for exploring host-pathogencoevolution. Methods We developed and refined methods to sample and sequence cyanobacteria, cyanophages, and measured features of their abiotic environment. Results The protocol described herein can successfully discriminate large-cell eukaryotic organisms, but size fractionation of picocyanobacteria appears to be affected by the presence of free DNA, multicellular structures, and abundant tycheposons. Our preferred final protocol from this exploratory effort included a combination of in-line and single vacuum flask filtrations, which reduced filtration processing time by over threefold in some cases compared to other tested methods, such as a fully in-line sequence or in-site filtrations. We successfully extracted an average of approximately 400–1200 ng for all filter fractions, with some variations between kits. Discussion The protocol described herein can successfully discriminate large-cell eukaryotic organisms, but size fractionation of picocyanobacteria appears to be affected by the presence of free DNA, multicellular structures, and abundant tycheposons.

Sex and APOE genotype specific brain regional vulnerability to Alzheimer's Disease - Qi Zeng; Minghui Wang; Erming Wang; Xianxiao Zhou; Peng Xu; Vahram Haroutunian; Dongming Cai; Bin Zhang; Michael Weiner; Paul Aisen; Ronald Petersen; Clifford R. Jack; et al. (GeroScience, 2026)
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) disproportionately affects women and carriers of the apolipoprotein E ε4 allele (APOE4), yet little is known about how sex and APOE interact to influence white matter (WM) integrity during disease progression. We integrated diffusion MRI and matched blood transcriptomic data to investigate these interactions and their underlying biological mechanisms. WM microstructure was quantified using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI), and regional vulnerability was assessed with a composite vulnerability score (CVS) derived from associations between diffusion features and AD severity across clinical traits in each of the four sex-APOE groups (female or male, with or without APOE4). Brain parcellation with the Eve atlas revealed regions consistently affected across sex-APOE groups (e.g., parahippocampal and superior temporal gyri) and regions specific to individual groups (e.g., the cingulum in females with APOE4 and the middle frontal gyrus in males without APOE4). Gene co-expression network analysis of the matched blood expression data identified gene subnetworks linked to group-specific regional vulnerability, including a muscle tissue morphogenesis module regulated by NEURL1B and HIST1H2BN associated with middle frontal gyrus vulnerability. These findings demonstrate that sex and APOE genotype jointly shape region-specific WM vulnerability and its molecular signatures in AD. Understanding these interactions provides novel mechanistic insights and may inform precision approaches to drug development, biomarker discovery, and clinical trial design for AD.

Intensive land use enhances soil ammonia-oxidising archaea at a continental scale - M. Bahram; L. Lehtovirta-Morley; V. Mikryukov; T.R. Sveen; A. Grant; M. Pent; F. Hildebrand; M. Labouyrie; J. Köninger; L. Tedersoo; A. Jones; P. Panagos; et al. (Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2026)

First evidence of CP violation in beauty baryon to charmonium decays - R. Aaij; A.S.W. Abdelmotteleb; C. Abellan Beteta; F. Abudinén; T. Ackernley; A.A. Adefisoye; B. Adeva; M. Adinolfi; P. Adlarson; C. Agapopoulou; C.A. Aidala; Z. Ajaltouni; et al. (Science Bulletin, 2026)

From bacterial to thermochemical sulfate reduction: Sulfur isotope constraints on the genesis of hyper-enriched black shales - Kyle M. Henderson; James R. Clark; Anthony E. Williams-Jones; Ryan Sharpe; Mostafa Fayek (Chemical Geology, 2026)

Evaluation of genetic diversity across multiple generations of a Eucalyptus nitens breeding population - Nana Y. Sarpong; Kelsey R. Joyce; René E. Vaillancourt; Brad M. Potts; Rebecca C. Jones (Tree Genetics & Genomes, 2026)

Multi-species aggregation and movement patterns of danaid butterflies (Nymphalidae: Danainae) in Hong Kong - Yuet Fung Ling; Emily E. Jones; Nicole Yu; Kirsten Boehm; Long In Cheung; Chun Hoi Law; Even Y. M. Leung; Megan Mei Yan Low; Rui Wang; Wing Kwong Yau; Sui Fai Hydrogen Pun; Yuk Lin Colleen Chiu; et al. (Journal of Insect Conservation, 2026)
Danaid butterflies (Nymphalidae: Danainae) in Asia form seasonal aggregations and/or exhibit migratory flights similar to those of the North American monarch ( Danaus plexippus ). In contrast to this well-studied single-species system, however, Asian danaids form smaller multi-species aggregations and show seasonal movements which remain relatively understudied. In this study, we used publicly reportable stickers to tag 15,918 danaid butterflies from 13 species and five genera ( Euploea , Tirumala , Danaus , Ideopsis , Parantica ) over four years in Hong Kong to elucidate patterns of seasonal aggregation and movements. Species assemblages were distinct at forested valley habitats versus open sites rich in pyrrolizidine alkaloid (PA) plants. Using mark-recapture, we estimated up to 16,000 butterflies in a single aggregation. Recoveries of 1,503 tags (50.6% reported by the public) revealed local movements of 78 individuals, but no butterflies were reported outside Hong Kong. The observed variation in aggregation dynamics and movement patterns indicate interspecific differences in site selection, overwintering strategies, and orientation of seasonal movement. Regional collaboration across southern China and the Indochinese region is necessary to understand these complicated patterns and inform the conservation of sensitive overwintering and migratory phenomena. Implications for insect conservation Aggregation and migration of Asian danaid butterflies may be similarly vulnerable to habitat and climate changes that have led to extensive declines in the migratory monarchs in North America. Our study highlights the need for dynamic and comprehensive conservation strategies that adequately consider the requirements of many species involved in the multi-species danaid systems in tropical and subtropical Asia.

Depth affects the population dynamics on a soft coral-dominated reef on the Great White Wall, Fiji - Nile P. Stephenson; Katie M. Delahooke; Charlotte G. Kenchington; Jone Waitaiti; Alice A. Ball; Victor E. Bonito; Andrea Manica; Emily G. Mitchell (Coral Reefs, 2026)
Soft corals (order Alcyonacea) are an important component of tropical coral reefs, and often form locally abundance dense carpets. Some soft coral species are prone to bleaching and heat stress like scleractinian, reef-forming corals, but others appear resistant to bleaching stressors. Despite the importance of soft corals in tropical reefs, there is limited knowledge regarding their demographic ecology. Spatial point process analysis (SPPA) enables inference of ecological processes underlying spatial distributions of individuals in a community by investigating the fit of models of known processes to observed spatial patterns. SPPA can also quantify how these underlying ecological processes change with environmental gradients (such as depth). We used SPPA to investigate the population ecology on the Great White Wall (GWW), Fiji—a vertical reef dominated by Nephtheidae soft corals alongside other filter feeders and algae. We found that a combination of reproductive and habitat association processes best explained the spatial patterns on the GWW. We found that the best-fit underlying ecological processes changed with depth, and that Nephtheidae soft corals became more dominant on deeper parts of the wall, likely due to a combination of reproductive lability, fast growth rates, and increasing suitable habitat associated with filter-feeding. Even where the Nephtheidae were most dominant, other filter feeders were able to persist. This mixed community composition could be because the Nephtheidae feed in periods of high current, and temporal niche partitioning in feeding could be permitting biodiversity on the GWW, allowing for hydroids and sponges to coexist with the Nephtheidae.

Inflammation and insulin profiles in men assigned to exercise vs. usual care for prostate cancer: results from the active surveillance exercise (ASX) randomized controlled trial - William A. Pace; Adam Olshen; Ye Wang; Stacey A. Kenfield; Erin L. Van Blarigan; Rebecca E. Graff; Janet Cowan; Lufan Wang; Imelda Tenggara; Karen Lopez; Katriel Encabo; Lee W. Jones; et al. (Cancer Causes & Control, 2026)
Objectives Physical activity is associated with reduced risk of prostate cancer (PCa) progression and death; changes in insulin sensitivity and inflammation are potential mediating mechanisms. This study examined whether exercise after PCa diagnosis affects insulin-related and inflammatory biomarkers. Methods The Active Surveillance Exercise (ASX) randomized controlled trial was assigned to men undergoing active surveillance for low-risk, localized PCa to a 16-week exercise intervention (home-based walking program; n = 26) or printed physical activity recommendations (control group; n = 25). Fasting blood samples were collected at baseline and after 16 weeks. Samples were analyzed for markers of insulinemia (insulin, C-peptide, adiponectin), inflammation (C-reactive protein (CRP)), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Biomarker changes over time and between arms were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models and intention-to-treat analysis. Results 22 (85%) intervention and 23 (92%) control participants, mean (SD) age of 63.6 (6.6) years, provided two blood samples. Average baseline biomarker values were within expected ranges. Analyses showed no changes within or differences in changes between intervention and control groups from baseline to 16 weeks for any biomarker ( p > 0.05). Conclusions We observed no changes in markers of insulinemia, inflammation, or PSA from a 16-week at-home walking intervention vs. control in individuals with low-risk PCa.

Drifting in the abyss: an in-situ observation of swimming in Psychropotes (Psychropotidae, Elasipodida, Holothuroidea) - Guadalupe Bribiesca-Contreras; Melanie Mackenzie; Antonina Kremenetskaia; Loïc Van Audenhaege; Bethany F. M. Fleming; Adrian G. Glover; Erik Simon-Lledó; Daniel O. B. Jones (Marine Biodiversity, 2026)
Holothuroids are conspicuous members of megabenthic assemblages, particularly in the deep sea. Some are capable of swimming and while this behaviour was once considered uncommon, deep-sea exploration and technological advances have increased the number of such observations. Swimming or drifting is now regarded to be a potentially common adaptation to deep-sea life that enables long distance dispersal at a low energetic cost and perhaps the ability to track ephemeral food sources. Swimming is well documented for some species, as well as the specialised structures such as brims, swimming lobes, modified podia, and other adaptations like gelatinous consistency, ossicle reduction and flattened bodies. Some species of Psychropotes Théel, 1882 have a long ‘tail’ (sail-like unpaired dorsal appendage) that has been suggested to facilitate drifting in near-seabed currents. Yet, to date, swimming had been mainly attributed to early life stages for these species, as these had been collected above the seafloor. While there is evidence that adults can also use this sail-like lobe to drift using bottom currents, the purpose of this dorsal appendage itself is still inconclusive. Here, we document a remotely operated vehicle observation of a long ‘tailed’ adult Psychropotes cf. semperiana Théel, 1882 actively swimming with the aid of anterior and posterior webbed podia fanning in synchrony, combined with dorso-ventral body flexing, while using the sail-like dorsal appendage to drift in the near-bottom water column.

Global Trends in Drought Impacts on Wildlife—A Review - Leah E. McTigue; Merijn van den Bosch; Hailey M. Boone; Hanna M. McCaslin; Lilly N. Jones; John M. Mola; Zachary L. Steel (Global Change Biology, 2026)
Drought is expected to increase in frequency and severity due to climate change, highlighting the urgency of understanding drought impacts on wildlife across geographies and taxonomic groups. We conducted a review of peer‐reviewed articles from 1982 to 2024, focusing on the impacts of anomalous drought on terrestrial vertebrates. We recorded 3324 total wildlife responses, 188 from single‐species studies and 3136 from multi‐species studies. Within single‐species studies, 66% of responses were negative, 32% were unclear, and 2% were positive, illustrating the widespread threat of increasing drought to global wildlife. Within multi‐species studies, 24% of responses were negative, and 5% were positive. Notably, 71% of responses within multi‐species papers were categorized as “unclear”, highlighting the need for additional investigation and the complexity of synthesizing a diverse literature. Drought impacts are not evenly tested across taxa, with birds being the most frequently studied (51% of documented responses), followed by mammals (28%), amphibians (16%), and reptiles (5%). Geographically, studies tended to occur most often where recent increases in anomalous drought have been observed (e.g., the Southwestern United States, South Africa, and Southeastern Australia). The sophistication of how drought is measured has increased over time, whereby studies increasingly defined drought as an anomalous event in comparison to a long‐term average through the use of drought indices, rather than as a short‐term weather event. However, we did not see consistency in indices used across the literature, which has the potential to present challenges for interpretation and synthesis. This review summarizes the predominantly negative impacts of drought on terrestrial vertebrates and the growing challenge of conserving wildlife in a changing world, while also highlighting gaps in our understanding of drought‐wildlife relationships that can guide future research.

Insights from equitable governance assessments in conservation areas around the world - Naira Dehmel; Kate Schreckenberg; Phil Franks; Nikoleta Jones; Francesca Booker; Cosmas Lambini; Ruth Pinto; Alejandra Cely‐Gómez; Ishmael Chaukura; Donald Chilengwe Chikumbi; Phanith Chou; Ioli Christopoulou; et al. (Conservation Biology, 2026)
Global policy commitments to ensure that protected and conserved areas (PCAs) are equitably governed have increased interest in empirically assessing and analyzing social equity. Although numerous assessments have been conducted in individual PCAs, there is limited empirical insight into equity as a multidimensional concept beyond the site level. We investigated the distributional, procedural, and recognitional equity challenges associated with the governance of PCAs and determined whether the identified challenges differed according to governance type and actor group. We conducted a meta‐level analysis of equitable governance assessments conducted at 37 PCAs in 19 countries that form part of the new SAGE (Site‐level Assessment of Governance and Equity) database. SAGE is a participatory tool for site‐level actors to systematically discuss and assess equity dynamics at their PCAs. We found a large variation in assessment results across the sites. Mitigating the negative impacts of conservation on local communities was most often identified as the biggest challenge. In general, equity assessments tended to be slightly more positive for PCAs governed by and with Indigenous Peoples and local communities than those governed purely by government agencies. Evaluations of different actors often revealed substantial differences in opinion on specific governance issues. In particular, evaluations of PCA decision‐makers tended to be more positive than those of PCA users. As an early‐stage exploration of the growing SAGE database, our findings provide proof of concept that tools for assessing and improving PCA governance gain value from taking multidimensional approaches and need to consider different actors’ views. Although the growing SAGE database holds potential for further insights on how equity is perceived across governance types, ecosystems, and geographical regions, the primary objective of SAGE needs to remain understanding and advancing equity at the site level.

Apparent flush-foraging in a crested guan (Penelope purpurascens) family party - Kathryn E. Vance; Duncan A. J. Pandya; Samuel E. I. Jones; Neil Reid; Hannah M. J. Hoskins; Thomas E. Martin (Ornithology Research, 2026)

Outcomes from a STEM Education Program for Elementary School Students in Medically Underserved Areas and Populations - Muriel R. Statman; Ethan N. Eisenstein; Madeleine Brown; Marcelo M. Sleiman; Rebecca B. Riggins; Jackie Eyl; Dorothy Jones-Davis; Liza Manfred; Dia Stone; Catherine J. Scharon; Laurel Harrington; Chiranjeev Dash; et al. (Journal of Cancer Education, 2026)

Spatial and temporal variations in the distribution of eastern Australian post-orogenic granites and related mineral deposits: metallogenic and tectonic significance - D. L. Huston; Y. Cheng; S. L. Jones; D. C. Champion; M. D. Norman; M. W. Agnew; A. Cross; V. C. Bennett; R. A. Creaser (Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2026)

A Lagrangian model of wave-induced beaching and resuspension of plastic particles - Jenny M. Mørk; Tor Nordam; Frode Leirvik; Arsalan Mostaani; Raymond Nepstad; Ralph Stevenson-Jones; Atle Kleven; Øyvind Breivik (Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2026)

Validating a Bayesian network model to characterise faecal indicator organism loss from septic tank systems in rural catchments - Chisha Chongo Mzyece; Miriam Glendell; Zisis Gagkas; Mads Troldborg; Camilla Negri; Eulyn Pagaling; Ian Jones; David M. Oliver (Water Research, 2026)

A 3He-based Holocene glacial chronology from Villarrica volcano, Chile - Yasmeen Orellana-Salazar; Shaun A. Marcott; Marissa M. Tremblay; Matias Romero; Pablo Moreno-Yaeger; Emily E. Mixon; Andrew G. Jones; Aaron M. Barth (Quaternary Science Reviews, 2026)

The effects of lead and manganese in soil on males and females of the dioecious herb Spinacia oleracea - M. Fisher; K. BéruBé; T. Jones; B. Rees; J. Sánchez Vilas (Flora, 2026)

The Toxicology Investigators Consortium 2024 Annual Report - Kim Aldy; Shao Li; Mari Costantini; Alyssa Falise; Rachel Culbreth; Paul M. Wax; Jeffery Brent; Michael Abesamis; Faiz Ahmed; Salman Ahsan; Peter Akpunonu; Adam Algren; et al. (Journal of Medical Toxicology, 2026)

Early life stress alters microglia in ventral hippocampus and dorsal CA2 associated with anxiety-like behavior in adolescent male rats - Kezzia Jones; Lindsay Teliska; Martine M. Mirrione; Adrienne J. Betz (Experimental Brain Research, 2026)
Early-life stressors profoundly affect hippocampal development and function, with potentially detrimental consequences in adulthood. For example, adversity in early life increases the risk for the development of psychiatric disorders, including major depressive disorder (MDD), in adulthood. Pathological changes in the hippocampus are linked to altered microglial activity. Given the role of microglia in stress and development, we utilized a widely recognized rodent model to investigate how maternal separation influences inflammatory activity in stress-sensitive brain regions. Specifically, we examined the microglial morphology of Iba1-positive cells in the dorsal and ventral hippocampal subfields, the nucleus accumbens (NAc) core and shell, and the medial orbital and prelimbic areas of the prefrontal cortex. Our results reveal that the ventral hippocampus is vulnerable to early life stress and predicts anxiety-like behavior, as evidenced by increased amoeboid-shaped microglia. We also observed elevated amoeboid microglial morphology in the dorsal CA2 region. No significant changes in microglial morphology were observed in the NAc or prefrontal cortex between the stressed and non-stressed male adolescent rodents. These findings demonstrate microglial dysfunction in early life stress and support previous research linking stress, mood disorders, and inflammation. Targeting microglial activation and hippocampal neuroinflammation has the potential to develop novel therapeutics that will impact the rising global incidence of MDD and other mental illnesses.

Soil property controls on plasticiser, antioxidant and UV absorber additive degradation across a global soil gradient - Michaela K. Reay; Martine Graf; Maddy Murphy; Charlie Monkley; Perrine J. Florent; Benjamin I. Collins; Nguyen Van Hien; Tran Minh Tien; Andreia Neves Fernandes; Tapan Adhikari; Samantha Viljoen; Mona Tolba; et al. (Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2025)
Additives in agricultural plastics can leach into the surrounding soil during use or improper disposal. Their subsequent degradation rates directly regulate whether they persist and accumulate to levels with ecotoxicological effects or are rendered benign. However, which soil properties primarily regulate the degradation of additives remains unclear (e.g. soil carbon, pH, available nutrients, microbial biomass and community structure). We assessed the degradation of the common plastic additives with different functionalities (DEHP (di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate; plasticiser), 2-hydroxy-4-n-octyloxybenzophenone (benzophenone-12; BP12; UV stabiliser) and AO168 (tris(2,4-di- tert -butylphenyl) phosphite; antioxidant)) in soils under controlled moisture and temperature conditions over 21 days across contrasting agricultural soils from six countries across a global transect (Australia, Brazil, Egypt, India, Vietnam and the UK). DEHP followed zero-order degradation kinetics, with negligible degradation in soils with low microbial biomass. BP12 degraded fastest via first-order degradation kinetics via ether cleavage and hydroxyl loss. The degradation of DEHP and BP12 was correlated with soil microbial biomass and nitrate concentration. BP12 degradation products detected included benzophenone and benzoic acid. DEHP is degraded via β-oxidation of alkyl groups to dibutyl phthalate and diethyl phthalate and through ester hydrolysis to phthalic acid. AO168 degraded via abiotic oxidation and phosphate ester hydrolysis to 2,4-di- tert -butyl-phenol, and degradation was not well correlated with any measured soil variable. Overall, these results show that the components of additive mixtures leached into soils will degrade at different rates due to varying mechanisms and controls exerted by the soil microbial biomass. Plastic additives have differing potentials to persist in agricultural soils globally, with some likely to accumulate to levels that may impact soil function and pose an ecotoxicological threat to soil biota.

Functional group composition of soil organic carbon varies between soil organic matter fractions but not with long-term cropping or soil depth - Wenxiang ZHOU; Brigid A. MCKENNA; Joshua BENNETT-JONES; Timothy I. MCLAREN; Ram C. DALAL; Peter M. KOPITTKE (Pedosphere, 2025)

Revealing the timing and dispersal of large explosive eruptions at Aso volcano (Japan) by integrating proximal and distal tephra records over the last 130 kyrs - Sophie O. Vineberg; Paul G. Albert; Danielle McLean; Takehiko Suzuki; Yasuo Miyabuchi; Hideo Hoshizumi; Hannah M. Buckland; Gwydion Jones; Fumikatsu Nishizawa; Richard A. Staff; Keitaro Yamada; Ikuko Kitaba; et al. (Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 2025)

Transient dilated cardiomyopathy phenotype and positive Bartonella serology in a cat - B. Ditzler; B. Lozano; C. Jones; M. Henderson; A.B. Saunders (Journal of Veterinary Cardiology, 2025)

Environmental considerations for the decommissioning of subsea cables - M.A. Clare; A.R. Gates; D.O.B. Jones; I.A. Yeo; A. Hilario; K.J.J. Van Landeghem; L. Harris; L. Carter; S. Appleby; P. Appleby; A. du Plessis; M. Logan; et al. (Journal of Environmental Management, 2025)

2nd update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 3,7-dimethyl-1,6-nonadien-3-ol, CAS Registry Number 10339-55-6 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

2nd update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, linalool, CAS Registry number 78-70-6 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 2H-indeno[4,5b] furan, decahydro-2,2,6,6,7,8,8-heptamethyl, CAS Registry Number 476332-65-7 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, γ-dodecalactone, CAS Registry Number 2305-05-7 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, palmitic acid, CAS Registry number 57-10-3 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 2,6,8-trimethylnonan-4-one, CAS Registry Number 123-18-2 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 2-methylbutyric acid, CAS Registry number 116-53-0 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 4,8-dimethyl-4,9-decadienal, CAS Registry number 71077-31-1 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, cedrene, CAS Registry Number 11028-42-5 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 5-methyl-3-heptanone, CAS Registry Number 541-85-5 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

RIFM natural complex substance (NCS) fragrance ingredient safety assessment, iris pallida oil, CAS registry number 8002-73-1, RIFM ID 265.A2.12 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 8H-indeno(4,5-B)furan,2,3,3a,4,5,5a,6,7,8a,9-decahydro-2,6,6,7,8,8-hexamethyl mixture of isomers, CAS Registry Number 338735-71-0 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 2-nonanone, CAS Registry Number 821-55-6 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 2-undecanone, CAS Registry Number 112-12-9 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 3-octanone, CAS registry number 106-68-3 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 2-decanone, CAS Registry Number 693-54-9 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 2-heptanone, CAS Registry Number 110-43-0 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, γ-heptalactone, CAS Registry Number CAS # 105-21-5 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, γ-valerolactone, CAS Registry Number 108-29-2 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, lauric acid, CAS Registry Number 143-07-7 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 2-octanone, CAS Registry Number 111-13-7 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

RIFM Natural Complex Substance (NCS) fragrance ingredient safety assessment, benzoin infusion, Sumatra, CAS Registry Number 9000-05-9, RIFM ID 104-K2.31 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 4-heptanone, CAS Registry Number 123-19-3 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 3-heptanone, CAS Registry Number 106-35-4 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, myrtenol, CAS Registry Number 515-00-4 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 3-phenylpropionic acid, CAS registry number 501-52-0 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, hexyl phenylacetate, CAS Registry Number 5421-17-0 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, methyl cyclohexadiene (mixture of isomers), CAS Registry Number 30640-46-1 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, decanoic acid, CAS Registry Number 334-48-5 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 5-methyl-5-propyl-2-(1-methylbutyl)-1,3-dioxan, CAS Registry Number 80480-24-6 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, octanoic acid, CAS Registry Number 124-07-2 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Corrigendum to “RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 1,3,5-undecatriene, CAS Registry Number 16356-11-9” [Food Chem. Toxicol. (2024 Mar) 183 Suppl 1 114303. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2023.114303. Epub 2023 Dec 4] - A.M. Api; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M.L. Dagli; W. Dekant; C. Deodhar; A.D. Fryer; L. Jones; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, p-isopropylacetophenone, CAS Registry Number 645-13-6 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, nonanoic acid, CAS Registry Number 112-05-0 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 4H-4a,9-methanoazuleno[5,6-d]-1,3-dioxole, octahydro-2,2,5,8,8,9a-hexamethyl-, (4aR,5R,7aS,9R)-, CAS Registry Number 211299-54-6 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, spiro[5.5]undec-8-en-1-one, 2,2,7,9-tetramethyl-, CAS Registry Number 502847-01-0 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, p-tolyl 3-methylcrotonate, CAS Registry Number 24700-20-7 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, hexanoic acid, CAS Registry Number 142-62-1 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 2-methyl-4-phenyl-1,3-dioxolane, CAS Registry Number 33941-99-0 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 2-hydroxyacetophenone, CAS Registry Number CAS # 118-93-4 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 4-isopropyl-2-methoxy-1-methylbenzene, CAS Registry Number 6379-73-3 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 1-ethynylcyclohexyl acetate, CAS Registry Number 5240-32-4 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 4,4a,5,9b-tetrahydroindeno[1,2-d]-1,3-dioxine, CAS Registry Number 18096-62-3 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 3-phenyl-1-propanol, CAS Registry Number 122-97-4 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, benzaldehyde, CAS Registry Number 100-52-7 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Prescribed fire management impacts on forest succession trajectories in future southern Appalachian forests - Kate Jones; Jelena Vukomanovic; Zachary J. Robbins; Robert M. Scheller (Ecological Modelling, 2025)

Deep-sea ecosystems of the North Atlantic Ocean: discovery, status, function and future challenges - A. Louise Allcock; Diva J. Amon; Amelia E.H. Bridges; Ana Colaço; Elva Escobar-Briones; Ana Hilário; Kerry L. Howell; Nélia C. Mestre; Frank E. Muller-Karger; Imants G. Priede; Paul V.R. Snelgrove; Kathleen Sullivan Sealey; et al. (Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 2025)

Patterns and thresholds for soil pH across Europe in relation to soil health and degradation - Inma Lebron; Christopher J. Feeney; Sabine Reinsch; Nima Shokri; Mehdi H. Afshar; Steve Lofts; Rob Griffiths; David Fidler; Briony Jones; Panos Panagos; Kasia Sawicka; Aidan M. Keith; et al. (CATENA, 2025)

Informing Conservation Planning with Population Estimates and Divergent Landscape Associations of Tidal Marsh Birds - Rachel V. Anderson; Landon R. Jones; Raymond B. Iglay; Kristine O. Evans; Jared M. Feura; Mark S. Woodrey (Wetlands, 2025)

Diversity of crystallization conditions of coherent kimberlites recorded in diamond surface textures: an experimental study - Yana Fedortchouk; Ingrid L. Chinn; Tom Nowicki; Jon A. Carlson; Shahbaz Bin Khalid; Elliot J. M. Bird; Rosa Toutah; Guangyuan Yu; Thomas Pierce-Jones (Mineralogy and Petrology, 2025)

A novel tape-free sample preparation method for human osteochondral cryosections for high throughput hyperspectral imaging - Xiwei Fan; Bogdan Donose; Michael W. M. Jones; Daryl Howard; Jari Torniainen; Karl Bertling; Xiao Guo; Cameron M. Kewish; Kah Meng Lee; Antonia Rujia Sun; Aleksandar Rakic; Ross Crawford; et al. (Histochemistry and Cell Biology, 2025)

Exploring experiences of the regulatory toxicology system: system-level promoters and inhibitors of new approach methodologies - Angela Bearth; Birgit Kopainsky; Lowenna B. Jones; Gunn E. Vist; Trine Husøy; Camilla Svendsen; Paul Whaley; Sebastian Hoffmann; Heather M. Ames; Gisle Solstad; Denise Bloch; Aleksandra Čavoški; et al. (Archives of Toxicology, 2025)
The transition from traditional animal-based approaches and assessments to New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) marks a scientific revolution in regulatory toxicology, with the potential of enhancing human and environmental protection. However, implementing the effective use of NAMs in regulatory toxicology has proven to be challenging, and so far, efforts to facilitate this change frequently focus on singular technical, psychological or economic inhibitors. This article takes a system-thinking approach to these challenges, a holistic framework for describing interactive relationships between the components of a system of interest. In this case, the regulatory toxicology system. We do so by analysing and interpreting a very large qualitative data set of experts’ observations, collected in a 3-day interactive workshop and three follow-up online workshops with a heterogeneous sample of experts representing major actors from the global regulatory toxicology system. We identified leverage points (where a small change within a system can have a disproportionately large effect) in the six core aspects—infrastructure, processes, culture, technology, goals, and actors—in the regulatory toxicology system to facilitate the effective use of NAMs. Identified systematic leverage points include the need for a functioning incentive structure for effectively discovering, developing, validating and using NAMs within academia, regulation, and industry; and measures that prevent or mitigate unwanted effects of using NAMs that acknowledge clashes between scientific, regulatory, political and social processes. The results serve as a basis for follow-up activities that reflect on the actual effectiveness of these levers and that develop measures for the regulatory toxicology system.

Prof Stephen P. Long, FRS (1950–2025) - Lorenzo Álvarez‐Filip; Edith Bai; Carl J. Bernacchi; Rhea Bruno; Klaus Butterbach‐Bahl; Maria Byrne; I‐Ching Chen; Shaolin Chen; William W. L. Cheung; M. Francesca Cotrufo; Tatenda Dalu; Xiaojuan Feng; et al. (Global Change Biology, 2025)

Reproductive Biology of the Smoothtail Spiny Lobster ( Panulirus laevicauda ) to Support Fisheries Management in Southeastern Brazil - Andressa C. M. de Melo; Luciano Pinto de Almeida; Glaucia Angelica Praxedes de Souza; Joelson Musiello‐Fernandes; Mauricio Hostim‐Silva; Jones Santander‐Neto (Fisheries Management and Ecology, 2025)
The smoothtail spiny lobster ( Panulirus laevicauda ) is one of the main target species for fisheries in Brazil. We aimed to estimate reproductive parameters of this species in support of a minimum legal size limit for the region. A sample of 508 individuals ranged 13.75–100 mm in cephalothorax length (CL) from the southern coast of Espírito Santo, Brazil, during 2020–2021. Males were more abundant than females. Females reached morphological maturity before males, at 68.4 mm CL, for both sexes. Reproduction was between November and March, and some large females were capable of spawning more than once during the reproductive period. Because large adult females could spawn more than once per season, we recommend increasing the legal minimum capture size of P. laevicauda to 70 mm CL in Brazil.

Increased quadriceps intermuscular adipose tissue in chronic liver disease is associated with an altered muscle transcriptome compared with healthy age matched controls - J. I. Quinlan; T. Nicholson; C. Bell; A. Dhaliwal; F. R. Williams; S. L. Allen; S. Choudhary; A. V. Rowlands; A. M. Elsharkawy; M. J. Armstrong; C. A. Greig; J. M. Lord; et al. (GeroScience, 2025)
Muscle fat infiltration (i.e., myosteatosis) is an important index of muscle health and pathology in disease states, such as chronic liver disease (CLD). However, it is unknown whether myosteatosis differs due to anatomical location. Further, the mechanistic implications of divergent intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) deposition remain unknown in patients with CLD. Thirty-three patients with CLD (55.0 ± 10.5 years) and 17 healthy controls (HC) (49.6 ± 15.4 years) were recruited. Quadriceps IMAT was estimated between 20 and 80% of muscle length and psoas IMAT at L3 via MRI. Body composition, muscle strength, and habitual activity were assessed. Fasted vastus lateralis muscle biopsies were collected and subjected to RNA sequencing analysis. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04734496. IMAT was greater in CLD compared with HC in both quadriceps and psoas ( P < 0.0001). Quadriceps IMAT positively correlated with BMI ( r = 0.62), body fat ( r = 0.65), age ( r = 0.36), and negatively correlated with maximal knee extensor strength ( r = −0.45) and habitual physical activity ( r = −0.50) in CLD and HC. One hundred sixty-nine differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in low IMAT CLD vs. HC, and 178 DEGs were identified in high IMAT CLD vs. HC. CLD patients with high and low IMAT exhibited defined expression profiles, with only 39 DEGs (representing 12.7%) in common. Pathway analysis of DEGs revealed enrichment of atrophic and pro-inflammatory pathways in the high IMAT group. IMAT is greater in patients with CLD compared to HC, irrespective of anatomical location, and is associated with reductions in muscle function and may be exacerbated by physical inactivity. IMAT appears to alter the muscle transcriptome in COLD, potentially exacerbating muscle loss. Graphical Abstract

Hazardous Environmental Pollutants and Cancer Disparities: A Systematic Review on the Consideration of Race and Ethnicity in Environmental Epidemiology Research - Molly E. Schwalb; Kala Visvanathan; Avonne E. Connor; Christine Marie George; Ana M. Rule; Eliseo Guallar; Miranda R. Jones (Current Environmental Health Reports, 2025)

Investigating Sulfotransferase Mediated Drug Interactions of Ethinylestradiol using a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model - Harry P. Moore; Kuan-Fu Chen; Aki T. Heikkinen; Sibylle Neuhoff; Udoamaka Ezuruike; Jean Dinh; Iain Gardner; Hannah M. Jones; Felix Stader (The AAPS Journal, 2025)

Globalism, localism and blue food systems – How can cross-scale tensions be reduced? A production perspective from UK seafood stakeholders - Alex J. Caveen; Bryce D. Stewart; Cameron Moffat; Daniel Skerritt; Estelle Jones; Huw Thomas; Lara Funk; Magnus Johnson; Mike Cohen; Michael Roach; Neil A. Auchterlonie; Samuel Peacock; et al. (Marine Policy, 2025)

Erratum to “Multiyear crop residue cover mapping using narrow-band vs. broad-band shortwave infrared satellite imagery” [Soil Tillage Res. 251 (2025) 1–19] - Brian T. Lamb; W. Dean Hively; Jyoti Jennewein; Alison Thieme; Alexander M. Soroka; Leticia Santos; Daniela Jones; Steven Mirsky (Soil and Tillage Research, 2025)

Ambient air pollution exposure and lung cancer risk in a large prospective U.S. cohort - Jared A. Fisher; Linda M. Liao; Barry I. Graubard; Joel D. Kaufman; Debra T. Silverman; Rena R. Jones (Science of The Total Environment, 2025)

Genomic analysis of Aeromonas species isolated from retail foods suggests an under-investigated population - Richard Harding-Crooks; Guerrino Macori; Vartul Sangal; Amanda L. Jones; Darren L. Smith; Séamus Fanning; Edward M. Fox (International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2025)

Associations between persistent organic pollutants and thyroid-related hormones and homeostasis parameters in middle-aged to older men and postmenopausal women: The HCHS/SOL - Chibuzor Abasilim; Victoria Persky; Robert M. Sargis; Tessa Day; Konstantina Tsintsifas; Martha Daviglus; Jianwen Cai; Sally Freels; Arielle Grieco; Brandilyn A. Peters; Carmen R. Isasi; Gregory A. Talavera; et al. (Environmental Research, 2025)

Combining temperature-depth recorder and GPS data improves identification of foraging habitat in diving seabirds - Daniel T. Johnston; Elizabeth A. Masden; Katherine A. Booth Jones; Elizabeth M. Humphreys (Marine Biology, 2025)

Nonlinear Internal Wave Mixing Observations Within the Interior of a River Plume - Preston Spicer; Kimberly Huguenard; Nicole L. Jones; Agata Piffer-Braga; Daniel G. MacDonald; Michael M. Whitney; Kelly L. Cole (Estuaries and Coasts, 2025)

Nutritional supplementation of Crassostrea virginica spat with Phaeodactylum tricornutum for hatchery production in Texas. - Ivy C. Jones; Elena K. Barrada; Christopher W. Jones; Christopher M. Hollenbeck (Aquaculture International, 2025)
Phaeodactylum tricornutum , a diatom identified as having superior survival and growth rates during South Texas winters compared to various commercially cultivated species, was assessed for its potential as a nutritional supplement for Crassostrea virginica spat. Oysters were collected from the Laguna Madre (Corpus Christi, TX, USA) and spawned to produce the spat used in this study. Spat were subject to five feeding treatments that involved replacing a standard microalgal diet with P. tricornutum to various degrees (0–100%). Water quality parameters were maintained at optimal levels for growth and survival. Comparison of growth metrics of the spat revealed no significant differences for the 0–50% feed replacements, indicating that up to 50% of the standard hatchery–produced juvenile oyster diet can be replaced with P. tricornutum with minimal effects on growth and survival. This information is important in that it could provide a more cost-effective and less labor-intensive solution for microalgae production in Texas, particularly in the southern region where natural phytoplankton supply may be seasonally limited.

Discovery of a mud‐covering cephalopod evidences the complex life habits in the abyss - Alejandra Mejía‐Saenz; Bethany F. M. Fleming; Daniel O. B. Jones; Loïc Van Audenhaege; Henk‐Jan Hoving; Erik Simon‐Lledó (Ecology, 2025)

Concerned but confused: Australian consumers’ awareness, understanding, and recognition of ultra-processed foods - Eden M. Barrett; Bella Sträuli; Daisy H. Coyle; Bridget Kelly; Caroline Miller; Alexandra Jones; Simone Pettigrew (Appetite, 2025)

A comparison of the life history and distribution of vermilion rockfish (Sebastes miniatus) and its cryptic pair, sunset rockfish (S. crocotulus) along the Pacific Coast - John H. Harms; Anita Wray; John R. Hyde; Gary C. Longo; Jennifer A. Hempelmann; Anna E. Elz; R. Matthew Barnhart; James A. Benante; Aaron C. Chappell; Peter H. Frey; Colin L. Jones; Betty Kamikawa; et al. (Fisheries Research, 2025)

Late gestation heat stress induces inflammation and impacts nutrient transfer signature in the placenta of dairy cows - Leticia T. Casarotto; Helen N. Jones; Pascale Chavatte-Palmer; Jillian M. Lance; Hirys Olmo; Geoffrey E. Dahl (Theriogenology, 2025)

A multi-source approach to groundwater storage and recharge assessment in the Volta Basin - Sergio A. Barbosa; Norman L. Jones; Gustavious P. Williams; Henok Teklu; Sandow M. Yidana; Sarva T. Pulla; Jorge Luis Sanchez; E. James Nelson; Daniel P. Ames; A. Woodruff Miller (Science of The Total Environment, 2025)

Wastewater surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza in a dynamic university community: understanding how wastewater measurements correspond to reported cases - Matthew J. Jones; Rukayya Ibrahim; Shirley Clark; Yolanda M. Brooks; Heather E. Preisendanz; Thomas L. Richard; Andrew F. Read; Courtney J. Robinson; Samina Noorali; Michael J. Shreve; Nina L. Dennington; Justin D. Silverman; et al. (Science of The Total Environment, 2025)

Taking advantage of open data in coastal science and conservation - Nicholas M. Hoad; Jonathan S. Lefcheck; Nikolaos Alexandridis; Benjamin L.H. Jones; Johan S. Eklöf; Lina Mtwana Nordlund (Science of The Total Environment, 2025)

Analysis of host and gut microbial biotransformation products of kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) by mass spectrometry - William J. Crandall; Ken H. Liu; Choon M. Lee; Grant Singer; Jaclyn Weinberg; Edward T. Morgan; Dean P. Jones; Cassandra L. Quave (Phytochemistry Letters, 2025)

Associations Between Sustainable Diet Scores and Sleep Health Indicators Among Mexican Women - A. Mohy; D. Su; K. Peterson; A. Jones; D. Conroy; A. Cantoral; M. Tellez-Rojo; L. Torres-Olascoaga; Y. Seo; E. Jansen (Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2025)

Can Fat Absorption Be enhanced with a Novel Medical Food? - C. Ireton-Jones; C. Brown; M. Fisklements; T. Ruvolo (Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2025)

Grain Intake Across Trimesters of Pregnancy Among Women Enrolled in the Glowing Study - L. Jones; W. Li; M. Glover; M. Vowels; L. Jansen (Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2025)

Adherence to MyPlate Guidelines During Glucagon-like-peptide-1 Treatment: A Cross-Sectional Study - B. Johnson; M. Milstead; L. Green; R. Kreider; R. Jones (Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2025)

Biodegradable mulch films exhibit slower-than-expected degradation with negligible effects on soil microbial communities - Martine Graf; Estelle Choiselat; Michaela K. Reay; Rafael Bargiela; Athanasios Dimitriou; Qiuyun Liu; Robert M. Elias; Peter N. Golyshin; Robert Griffiths; David R. Chadwick; Davey L. Jones (Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2025)

Late Paleozoic climate transition from a long-term carbon cycle modeling perspective - Chloé M. Marcilly; Trond H. Torsvik; Morgan T. Jones (Global and Planetary Change, 2025)

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, benzeneacetonitrile, a-butylidene-, (Z), CAS Registry Number 130786-09-3 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, geraniol, CAS registry number 106-24-1 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 2-phenoxyethanol, CAS Registry number 122-99-6 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, cinnamyl alcohol, CAS Registry Number 104-54-1 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, benzyl alcohol, CAS Registry Number 100-51-6 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, benzoic acid, 2-[[3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-methylpropylidene]amino]-, methyl ester, CAS registry number 111753-62-9 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

2nd update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 4-carvomenthenol, CAS Registry Number 562-74-3 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 2-tert-butylcyclohexyl acetate, CAS registry number 88-41-5 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 3-tert-butylcyclohexyl acetate, CAS Registry Number 31846-06-7 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 4-tert-butylcyclohexyl acetate, CAS Registry Number 32210-23-4 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Depression of intracranial self-stimulation in male and female rats by intraperitoneal lactic acid: effects of morphine, ketoprofen, and interactions with G-protein biased kappa opioid agonists - Thomas J. Martin; Conner W. Martin; Kevin J. Frankowski; Bruce E. Blough; Jeffrey Aubé; Laura M. Bohn; Sara R. Jones (Psychopharmacology, 2025)
Introduction Numerous pharmacological classes of compounds have been explored as novel and efficacious alternatives to standard mu opioid agonist analgesics. We and others have described G-protein biased kappa opioid agonists as having potential utility as analgesics due to a lower propensity to produce sedation and dysphoria, which are thought to be mediated in large part through beta-arrestin signaling. Methods Here we compare two G-protein biased kappa agonists that differ in their basic chemical scaffold, triazole 1.1 (Tr1.1) and isoquinolinone 2.1 (Iso2.1), for alteration of intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) in male and female rats. Lactic acid (LA) was given i.p. at a concentration sufficient to produce moderate to severe depression of ICSS. Results Neither Tr1.1 nor Iso2.2 reversed the effects of lactic acid at concentrations that produced significant depression of ICSS in either sex. Neither drug altered ICSS in the absence of lactic acid administration. In both males and females, morphine reversed the effects of i.p. lactic acid on ICSS and co-administration of Tr1.1 did not alter the dose–effect curve for morphine in either sex. Similar effects were observed for ketoprofen. Ketoprofen also reversed the effects of i.p. lactic acid on ICSS in both sexes in a dose-dependent manner, and co-administration of neither Tr1.1 nor Iso2.1 altered the ketoprofen dose–effect curve. Conclusions These data suggest that these G-protein biased kappa agonists may lack sufficient efficacy or potency to alter the effects of opioids or NSAIDs against moderate to severe antinociceptive stimuli in rats, and development of more potent or efficacious compounds may be required to demonstrate efficacy in rat models of moderate to severe nociception.

The Impact of Water on Brittleness and Fracturability: Evaluating Organic-Rich Argillite from the Naparima Hill Formation - O. O. Blake; U. C. Iyare; K. T. Ramjarrie; A. M. Harrypersad-Daniel; L. Sobers; D. Chakrabarti; D. Davis; K. S. Banerjee; D. Jones (Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2025)

Correction to: Bottom-up perspective – The role of roots and rhizosphere in climate change adaptation and mitigation in agroecosystems - T. S. George; D. Bulgarelli; A. Carminati; Y. Chen; D. Jones; Y. Kuzyakov; A. Schnepf; M. Wissuwa; T. Roose (Plant and Soil, 2025)

Multi-wavelength internal standardization using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry - Reagan Elia; Thomas J. Johnston; Alberto D. Figueroa; Emily M. Curbow; Mayra S. Gonzalez Guzman; Leah C. Rodriguez Cabrera; Marisa M. Morcom; Willis B. Jones (Analytica Chimica Acta, 2025)

Evaluating Seasonal vs. Spatial Extrapolation for Cetacean Distribution Models in the California Current - Elizabeth A. Becker; Karin A. Forney; Bruce J. Thayre; Katherine Whitaker; Ryan Hoopes; Joshua M. Jones; John A. Hildebrand; Jeff Moore (Marine Mammal Science, 2025)
Species distribution models (SDMs) have been developed for multiple cetacean species within the California Current Ecosystem (CCE) from shipboard survey data collected by the Southwest Fisheries Science Center (SWFSC) in summer and fall, thus limiting the ability to inform management decisions in cool seasons when abundance and distribution patterns are substantially different. Winter and spring SDMs have been developed for a few species using California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations (CalCOFI) shipboard survey data, but model predictions are limited to the waters off southern and central California. In this study, winter and spring density estimates for the entire CCE study area were made from SWFSC summer and fall model predictions (temporal extrapolation) and CalCOFI winter and spring model predictions (spatial extrapolation) for short‐beaked common dolphin ( Delphinus delphis delphis ), Pacific white‐sided dolphin ( Lagenorhynchus obliquidens ), Dall's porpoise ( Phocoenoides dalli ), and fin whale ( Balaenoptera physalus ). The performance of the models was compared based on available abundance estimates and documented distribution patterns in the cool seasons. Results reveal species‐specific ecological factors to consider when extrapolating model predictions temporally or spatially, including whether a given study area includes a species “core habitat”, and whether static variables should be included when a species exhibits temporal distribution shifts.

Trends in Abundance of Sea Lice Lepeophtheirus salmonis and Caligus clemensi on Juvenile Wild Pacific Salmon Unchanged Following Cessation of Salmon Aquaculture in Coastal British Columbia - Simon R. M. Jones; Crawford W. Revie; Lance Stewardson (Journal of Fish Diseases, 2025)

Measuring fish cognition: empirical‐based guidance for designing cognition assays - Nick A. R. Jones; Joachim G. Frommen; Theodora Fuss; Cait Newport; Cairsty DePasquale; Michael M. Webster; Catarina Vila‐Pouca; Libor Závorka; Anne Gro Vea Salvanes (Journal of Fish Biology, 2025)

Demystifying the Romanticized Narratives About Carbon Credits From Voluntary Forest Conservation - Thales A. P. West; Kelsey Alford‐Jones; Philippe Delacote; Philip M. Fearnside; Ben Filewod; Ben Groom; Clemens Kaupa; Andreas Kontoleon; Tara L'Horty; Benedict S. Probst; Federico Riva; Claudia Romero; et al. (Global Change Biology, 2025)
Carbon offset projects aimed at avoiding deforestation and forest degradation, generally labeled “REDD+,” are frequently promoted as a pivotal tool to mitigate climate change, promising to offer additional co‐benefits for biodiversity and local communities. Despite this optimism, most positive impacts claimed by these initiatives in the voluntary carbon market (VCM) lack empirical support and are instead based on the hopeful narratives of stakeholders with clear conflicts of interest. We critically examine the scientific theories, concepts, and evidence regarding VCM's REDD+ projects, highlighting limitations on the quantification of their purported benefits that are inherent to the current design of carbon markets. Independent studies consistently point to shortcomings in the rigor and credibility of crediting methodologies and other procedures, which market players have been slow or reluctant to address. There is accumulating evidence that projects' climate and social impacts are often exaggerated due to a range of technical and practical shortcomings. We hope this work clarifies widespread misconceptions associated with REDD+ projects in the VCM and assists organizations and policymakers in their efforts to meaningfully mitigate climate change.

Geographic, Taxonomic and Metric Gaps in Biodiversity Research Limit Evidence‐Based Conservation in Agricultural Landscapes: An Umbrella Review - Jonathan Bonfanti; Joseph Langridge; A. Avadí; N. Casajus; A. Chaudhary; G. Damour; N. Estrada‐Carmona; S. K. Jones; D. Makowski; M. Mitchell; R. Seppelt; Damien Beillouin (Ecology Letters, 2025)
Agriculture is fundamentally dependent on biodiversity, yet unsustainable management practices increasingly threaten various organisms and ecosystem services. Confronting the global crisis of biodiversity loss requires a thorough understanding of the gaps, clusters and biases in existing knowledge across various management practices, spatial scales, and taxonomic groups. We undertook a comprehensive literature review, synthesising secondary data from 200 meta‐analyses on agricultural management impacts on biodiversity in croplands. Our systematic map covers 1885 comparisons (mean effect sizes), from over 9000 primary studies. In the latter, seven high‐income countries prevail (notably the USA, China and Brazil), with particular focus on fertiliser use, phytosanitary interventions and crop diversification. This emphasis on individual practices overshadows research at the farm and landscape levels. In secondary evidence, arthropods and microorganisms are most frequently studied, while annelids, vertebrates and plants are less represented. Evidence predominantly stems from averaged abundance data, revealing substantial gaps in studies on functional and phylogenetic diversity. Our findings highlight the need to analyse combinations of multiple practices to accurately reflect real‐world farming contexts, and covering a wider range of taxa, biodiversity metrics and spatial levels, to enable evidence‐based conservation strategies in agriculture. Given the uneven evidence on agricultural impacts, caution is required when applying meta‐analytical findings to public policies and global assessments.

Surface-based morphometry reveals divergent aging trajectories in veterans with and without traumatic brain injury - Michelle C. Eliason; Amrutha Bindu Nagella; Cristian Cuadra; David S. Wack; Ghazala T. Saleem; Michael Weiner; Paul Aisen; Ronald Petersen; Clifford R. Jack; William Jagust; John Q. Trojanowki; Arthur W. Toga; et al. (GeroScience, 2025)

Twenty years of change in a southeast Florida Acropora cervicornis thicket - Daniel M. Perez; Nicholas P. Jones; Elizabeth A. Goergen; David S. Gilliam (Frontiers in Marine Science, 2025)
Acropora cervicornis historically exists in large, dense thickets that provide a functionally unique habitat. However, populations in the Caribbean have declined by up to 98%, frequently isolating extant colonies. Remnant thickets are valuable research areas as they provide opportunities to assess community dynamics, resilience, succession, and the response to disturbances. BCA (Broward County Acropora) is a 10,000-m 2 A. cervicornis thicket located offshore Broward County in the Southeast Florida Coral Reef Ecosystem Conservation Area (Coral ECA), which has been monitored since 2003. The objective of this study was to analyze temporal changes in the thicket, specifically assessing the impact of disturbances and community dynamics that corresponded with fluctuations in the ratio between living and dead A. cervicornis . Photographic data were collected along 12 permanent transects to assess temporal changes in the percent benthic cover from 2003 to 2022. Demographic data on non- A. cervicornis corals were collected along four belt transects from 2012 to 2022. Live A. cervicornis cover declined from 34.8% ± 2% SE in 2003 to 2.4% ± 0.6% SE in 2022. The most severe declines corresponded with heat stress events and two hurricanes in 2005; a cold stress event in 2010; and heat stress, disease, and predation outbreaks between 2014 and 2016. As A. cervicornis died, other taxa utilized the remaining dead structure, with increases in the encrusting, weedy coral species Agaricia agaricites and the macroalgal and crustose coralline algal cover. However, the structural decline in later years suggests complete loss of this unique and complex habitat in the coming years. Thicket recovery will likely require active restoration and a reduction in local and global stressors.

P22-32 Knowledge Infrastructure supporting image-based characterisation of 2D graphene materials - P.P. Ankli; A.A. Abdelwahab; A. Logachov; R. Bugiel; D. Drobne; S. Novak; E. Kranjc; S. Saje; F. Pellegrino; E. Alladio; F. Sordello; E. Corrao; et al. (Toxicology Letters, 2025)

P31-15 Building structure activity relationships (SAR) to avoid undesired CNS ion channel activity - R. Roberts; L. Zolkiewski; K. Rockley; H. Jennings; M. Maizières; K. Jones; E. Griffen; M. Morton (Toxicology Letters, 2025)

Multiyear crop residue cover mapping using narrow-band vs. broad-band shortwave infrared satellite imagery - Brian T. Lamb; W. Dean Hively; Jyoti Jennewein; Alison Thieme; Alexander M. Soroka; Leticia Santos; Daniela Jones; Steven Mirsky (Soil and Tillage Research, 2025)

Microbial controls of nitrogen retention and N2O production in cropping systems supporting soil carbon accrual - Aurélien Saghaï; Oliver C. Moore; Christopher M. Jones; Sara Hallin (Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2025)

Resistance and resilience of co-occurring nitrifying microbial guilds to drying-rewetting stress in soil - Laura J. Müller; Mara Alicke; Sana Romdhane; Grace Pold; Christopher M. Jones; Aurélien Saghaï; Sara Hallin (Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2025)

Ambient dioxin exposure and incidence of lymphoid malignancies in large prospective US cohorts of female nurses - Jie Chen; Jaime E. Hart; Trang VoPham; Elise G. Elliott; Rena R. Jones; Mary H. Ward; Francine Laden; Brenda M. Birmann (Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2025)

Links between poverty, climate-induced migration and deforestation in western Madagascar - Herizo T. Andrianandrasana; Nikoleta Jones; Fabiola F. Viraina; Chrysovalantis Malesios; Marco Campera; Sama Zefania; Peter R. Long; Stéphanie Panichelli-Batalla; Nigel M. Richardson; Jessica Savage (Environmental Development, 2025)

Biogenic Si cycling along the Cocos Ridge: differences between in situ and ex situ extracted pore waters imply rapid rates of dissolved Si uptake upon core recovery - Matthew P. Quinan; William M. Berelson; Jaclyn E.P. Cetiner; Nick E. Rollins; Frank J. Pavia; Sijia Dong; Janice L. Jones; Mark A. Brzezinski; Jess F. Adkins (Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 2025)

Towards an enhanced understanding of animal ecology and aquatic systems via an integrated stable isotope-acoustic telemetry approach—a review and future directions - Silviya V. Ivanova; Selina Al-Nazzal; Alyssa M. Andersen; Taylor Bendig; Zach D. Jones; Joshua Lyons; Lydia L. Paulic; Rylie L. Robinson; Nathan D. Stewart; Cecilia E. Heuvel (Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 2025)

The functional traits behind fish rarity in an impounded river basin - L. E. Miranda; Hayden G. Funk; Kevin W. Jones; Corey G. Dunn; Kurt M. Lakin (Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 2025)

The root cortex of the Poaceae: a diverse, dynamic, and dispensable tissue - Dylan H. Jones; Kaisa Kajala; Dorota Kawa; Ivan Lopez-Valdivia; Tino Kreszies; Hannah M. Schneider (Plant and Soil, 2025)
Background The root cortex in Poaceae is a diverse, dynamic, and dispensable composite layer of tissue. Early in plant growth, the cortex in Poaceae roots primarily consists of parenchyma cells. However, as the root continues to develop, while encountering varying environmental conditions, the cortex undergoes substantial structural and functional changes. These modifications involve either cell wall modifications or programmed cell death, to form tissues including the endodermis, exodermis, sclerenchyma, and aerenchyma, or to result in cortical senescence. The dynamic spatial architecture of these tissues plays a crucial role in storage, microbial interactions, physical protection, biosynthesis of metabolites, and the radial movement of water, nutrients, and gases, and therefore, biotic and abiotic stress tolerance. Scope Here, we aim to explore cortical tissues in axial roots of Poaceae and how their capacity for plastic responses to environmental cues underscores their role in plant adaptation and climate resilience. We also highlight key research gaps and opportunities to facilitate our understanding of this composite layer of tissue and its role in plant stress response and rhizosphere interactions. Conclusions Axial root cortical tissues and their capacity for dynamic change are major drivers of adaptation and resilience in the Poaceae. Understanding the function and variability of root cortical tissues has potential to improve plant stress tolerance to a number of abiotic and biotic factors across a range of species and environments. Cortical tissues, and the plasticity thereof, may be useful breeding targets for improved soil resource capture and stress tolerance.

Toward a monocot SynBio toolkit: assessing regulatory element performance and eudicot compatibility - David B. May; Alexander C. Pfotenhauer; Bryn L. Concha; Li Li; Samantha M. Jones; Stacee A. Harbison; Lana H. Martin; Lindsey A. Clark; Alessandro Occhialini; C. Neal Stewart; Scott C. Lenaghan (Plant Cell Reports, 2025)

Relation of wind direction and coal terminal activity patterns with air pollution burden in a community bordering a coal export terminal, Curtis Bay, Maryland, USA - Lauren N. Deanes; Bonita D. Salmerón; Matthew A. Aubourg; Laura E. Schmidt; Kristoffer Spicer; Caila Wagar; Gregory G. Sawtell; Carlos C. Sanchez-Gonzalez; David Jones; Angela Shaneyfelt; David H. Hagan; David McClosky; et al. (Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 2025)

Population variation in physiological and behavioural responses to artificial light at night - Kathryn B. McNamara; Nicholas Fitzgerald; Zion Kim; Nicola-Anne J. Rutkowski; Nathan W. Bailey; Therésa M. Jones (Animal Behaviour, 2025)

Development of a mathematical model of the innate immune response to inhaled toxicants - Aamy Bakry; Emma Brashear; Jacob Brashear; Shannon Z. Jones; Marcella M. Torres (Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2025)

Utilisation of wood stove fuels produced by washing and torrefaction of short rotation coppice willow grown on contaminated land - David P. Maxwell; Bijal A. Gudka; Jenny M. Jones; Alan Williams (Fuel, 2025)

Collapse and restoration of mature forest habitat in California - Gavin M. Jones; Brandon M. Collins; Lacey E. Hankin; Ronan Hart; Marc D. Meyer; Jon Regelbrugge; Zachary L. Steel; Craig Thompson (Biological Conservation, 2025)

The normalised difference vegetation index as an analytic tool for wheat crop yield prediction: A review and meta-analysis - Ignacio Fuentes; Dhahi Al-Shammari; Ali K. M. Al-Nasrawi; Yan Wang; Jie Wang; Youssef Lebrini; Yang Chen; Brian G. Jones; Thomas F. A. Bishop (Precision Agriculture, 2025)

Traditional and industrial approaches to oil palm cultivation alter the biodiversity of ground-dwelling arthropods in Liberia (West Africa) - Jonathan H. Timperley; Brogan L. Pett; Bility Geninyan; Ari Saputra; Abraham Vincent; Romeo Weah; Benedictus Freeman; Marshall Guahn; Peter M. Hadfield; Morris T. Jah; Tiecanna Jones; Rudy H. Widodo; et al. (Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2025)

Improving how we use workshops when solving complex research problems: reflections from the CHANGE project - Lowenna B. Jones; Paul Whaley; Angela Bearth; Gunn E. Vist; Trine Husøy; Sebastian Hoffmann; Camilla Svendsen; Heather M. Ames; Gisle Solstad; Gro H. Mathisen (Archives of Toxicology, 2025)

Societal value of seagrass from historical to contemporary perspectives - Nicole R. Foster; Eugenia T. Apostolaki; Katelyn DiBenedetto; Carlos M. Duarte; David Gregory; Karina Inostroza; Dorte Krause-Jensen; Benjamin L. H. Jones; Eduard Serrano; Rym Zakhama-Sraieb; Oscar Serrano (Ambio, 2025)
Seagrasses have been entwined with human culture for millennia, constituting a natural resource that has supported humanity throughout this history. Understanding the societal value of seagrass fosters appreciation of these ecosystems, encouraging conservation and restoration actions to counteract historic and predicted losses. This study overviews the plethora of seagrass use in human history, ranging from spiritual and ceremonial roles, direct and indirect food resources, medicines and raw materials, dating back more than 180 000 years. While many past uses have been abandoned in modern societies, others have persisted or are being rediscovered, and new applications are emerging. As these uses of seagrasses depend on harvesting, we also underscore the need for sustainable practices to (re)generate positive interactions between seagrasses and society. Our review contributes to revalue seagrass societal ecosystem services, highlighting ancient and more recent human and seagrass relationships to incentivize conservation and restoration actions.

Combining Observations and Models: A Review of the CARDAMOM Framework for Data‐Constrained Terrestrial Ecosystem Modeling - Matthew A. Worden; T. Eren Bilir; A. Anthony Bloom; Jianing Fang; Lily P. Klinek; Alexandra G. Konings; Paul A. Levine; David T. Milodowski; Gregory R. Quetin; T. Luke Smallman; Yinon M. Bar‐On; Renato K. Braghiere; et al. (Global Change Biology, 2025)
The rapid increase in the volume and variety of terrestrial biosphere observations (i.e., remote sensing data and in situ measurements) offers a unique opportunity to derive ecological insights, refine process‐based models, and improve forecasting for decision support. However, despite their potential, ecological observations have primarily been used to benchmark process‐based models, as many past and current models lack the capability to directly integrate observations and their associated uncertainties for parameterization. In contrast, data assimilation frameworks such as the CARbon DAta MOdel fraMework (CARDAMOM) and its suite of process‐based models, known as the Data Assimilation Linked Ecosystem Carbon Model (DALEC), are specifically designed for model‐data fusion. This review, motivated by a recent CARDAMOM community workshop, examines the development and applications of CARDAMOM, with an emphasis on its role in advancing ecosystem process understanding. CARDAMOM employs a Bayesian approach, using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm to enable data‐driven calibration of DALEC parameters and initial states (i.e., carbon pool sizes) through observation operators. CARDAMOM's unique ability to retrieve localized model process parameters from diverse datasets—ranging from in situ measurements to global satellite observations—makes it a highly flexible tool for analyzing spatially variable ecosystem responses to environmental change. However, assimilating these data also presents challenges, including data quality issues that propagate into model skill, as well as trade‐offs between model complexity, parameter equifinality, and predictive performance. We discuss potential solutions to these challenges, such as reducing parameter equifinality by incorporating new observations. This review also offers community recommendations for incorporating emerging datasets, integrating machine learning techniques, strengthening collaboration with remote sensing, field, and modeling communities, and expanding CARDAMOM's relevance for localized ecosystem monitoring and decision‐making. CARDAMOM enables a deep, mechanistic understanding of terrestrial ecosystem dynamics that cannot be achieved through empirical analyses of observational datasets or weakly constrained models alone.

A Review of Abrupt Permafrost Thaw: Definitions, Usage, and a Proposed Conceptual Framework - Hailey Webb; Matthias Fuchs; Benjamin W. Abbott; Thomas A. Douglas; Clayton D. Elder; Jessica Gilman Ernakovich; Eugenie S. Euskirchen; Mathias Göckede; Guido Grosse; Gustaf Hugelius; Miriam C. Jones; Charles Koven; et al. (Current Climate Change Reports, 2025)
Purpose of Review We review how ‘abrupt thaw’ has been used in published studies, compare these definitions to abrupt processes in other Earth science disciplines, and provide a definitive framework for how abrupt thaw should be used in the context of permafrost science. Recent Findings We address several aspects of permafrost systems necessary for abrupt thaw to occur and propose a framework for classifying permafrost processes as abrupt thaw in the future. Based on a literature review and our collective expertise, we propose that abrupt thaw refers to thaw processes that lead to a substantial persistent environmental change within a few decades. Abrupt thaw typically occurs in ice-rich permafrost but may be initiated in ice-poor permafrost by external factors such as hydrologic change (i.e., increased streamflow, soil moisture fluctuations, altered groundwater recharge) or wildfire. Summary Permafrost thaw alters greenhouse gas emissions, soil and vegetation properties, and hydrologic flow, threatening infrastructure and the cultures and livelihoods of northern communities. The term ‘abrupt thaw’ has emerged in scientific discourse over the past two decades to differentiate processes that rapidly impact large depths of permafrost, such as thermokarst, from more gradual, top-down thaw processes that impact centimeters of near-surface permafrost over years to decades. However, there has been no formal definition for abrupt thaw and its use in the scientific literature has varied considerably. Our standardized definition of abrupt thaw offers a path forward to better understand drivers and patterns of abrupt thaw and its consequences for global greenhouse gas budgets, impacts to infrastructure and land-use, and Arctic policy- and decision-making.

The potential contribution of citizen science data in the study of coastal microplastic and mesoplastic distributions - David M. Jones; Jonathan Potts; Michelle S. Hale (Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2025)
Plastic pollution in marine environments is an escalating global issue, particularly in coastal regions where geomorphic processes and relatively high waste input can lead to significant accumulation. In this study, we analysed citizen science (CS) data from the Big Microplastic Survey (BMS), collected by volunteers across 39 countries between March 2018 and April 2024. The BMS project provided information about microplastic (MP) and mesoplastic (MEP) distributions from coastlines around the world. Using descriptive statistics, we examined volunteer participation and engagement, as well as the geographical distribution of MPs and MEPs based on characteristics and colour. Our analysis highlighted some of the challenges associated with CS projects and the importance of organisational affiliations in influencing data submission. There was substantial variability in the geographical distributions of plastics, suggesting regional pollution dynamics that were influenced by both anthropogenic and natural coastal processes. In this study, our analysis of global, regional, and localised data underscored the value of CS in augmenting traditional scientific methods, providing critical insights into coastal plastic pollution, and potentially engaging communities in environmental stewardship. We also discovered that engaging with non-governmental organisations (NGOs) was particularly effective in facilitating data collection. We advocate for a strategic focus on organisational participation in CS projects, to improve data collection and assess spatial and temporal trends more fully.

Nationwide sociodemographic patterns in airborne exposure to probable carcinogens from industrial sources - Caroline N. Pruitt; Jared A. Fisher; Abigail R. Flory; Barry I. Graubard; Mary H. Ward; Rena R. Jones; Jessica M. Madrigal (Science of The Total Environment, 2025)

Corrigendum to FTIR spectra from grass pollen: A quest for species-level resolution of Poaceae and Cerealia-type pollen grains [Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 321 (2024): 105039] - F. Katsi; M.S. Kent; M. Jones; W.T. Fraser; P.E. Jardine; W. Eastwood; M. Mariani; C. Osborne; S. Edwards; B.H. Lomax (Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 2025)

Phosphorylation-activated G protein signaling stabilizes TCP14 and JAZ3 to repress JA signaling and enhance plant immunity - Haiyan Jia; Natalie Hewitt; Lucía Jordá; Tigran M. Abramyan; Josh Tolliver; Janice L. Jones; Kinya Nomura; Jing Yang; Sheng-Yang He; Alexander Tropsha; Antonio Molina; Henrik G. Dohlman; et al. (Molecular Plant, 2025)

Reconciling scale using the Resist-Accept-Direct (RAD) Framework to improve management of woody encroachment in grasslands - Rheinhardt Scholtz; Daniel R. Uden; Brady W. Allred; Victoria M. Donovan; Jeremy D. Maestas; Scott L. Morford; Matthew O. Jones; David E. Naugle; Samantha M. Cady; Dillon T. Fogarty; Alexander L. Metcalf; Brian Chaffin; et al. (Journal of Environmental Management, 2025)

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, phenyl salicylate, CAS Registry Number 118-55-8 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, fenchone, CAS Registry Number 1195-79-5 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, phenethyl acetate, CAS registry number 103-45-7 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, hydroxycitronellal diethyl acetal, CAS Registry Number 7779-94-4 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, amylcyclohexyl acetate (mixed isomers), CAS Registry Number 67874-72-0 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, octanal dimethyl acetal, CAS Registry Number 10022-28-3 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, linalyl hexanoate, CAS Registry Number 7779-23-9 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 2-methylundecanal dimethyl acetal, CAS Registry Number 68141-17-3 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, hydroxycitronellal dimethyl acetal, CAS Registry number 141-92-4 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 2-isobutylquinoline, CAS registry number 93-19-6 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 2-methyl quinoline, CAS registry number 91-63-4 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 1,1-diethoxyisooctane, CAS Registry Number 69178-43-4 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, nonane, 1,1-diethoxy-, CAS Registry Number 54815-13-3 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 1,1-diethoxy-3,5,5-trimethylhexane, CAS registry number 86198-35-8 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 2-(methylpropyl)quinoline, CAS registry number 1333-58-0 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, decanal dimethyl acetal, CAS Registry Number 7779-41-1 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 4-isopropylphenol, CAS Registry Number 99-89-8 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 3-buten-2-one, 4-(2,2,3-trimethyl-6-methylenecyclohexyl)-, CAS registry number 79-68-5 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, heptanal dimethyl acetal, CAS registry number 10032-05-0 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 1,1-diethoxyhexane, CAS registry number 3658-93-3 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 2-acetyl-5-methylfuran, CAS Registry Number 1193-79-9 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, isophytol, CAS Registry Number 505-32-8 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M.L. Dagli; W. Dekant; C. Deodhar; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 2-furyl methyl ketone, CAS Registry Number 1192-62-7 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

RIFM Natural Complex Substance (NCS) fragrance ingredient safety assessment, savory winter oil, CAS Registry Number 90106-57-3, RIFM ID 1181-E2.12 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

RIFM natural complex substance (NCS) fragrance ingredient safety assessment, ho wood oil, CAS Registry Number 8022-91-1, RIFM ID 217-D2.12 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, dimethylcyclohex-3-ene-1-carbaldehyde (isomer unspecified), CAS Registry Number 27939-60-2 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 6-methyl-2-(4-methyl-3-cyclohexen-1-yl)-5-hepten-2-ol, CAS Registry Number 515-69-5 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, maltol, CAS registry number 118-71-8 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 3-(5,5,6-trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]hept-2-yl)cyclohexan-1-ol, CAS registry number 3407-42-9 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, benzyl valerate, CAS Registry Number 10361-39-4 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, isocyclocitral, CAS Registry Number 1335-66-6 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

RIFM Natural Complex Substance (NCS) fragrance ingredient safety assessment, ho leaf oil, CAS Registry Number 8022-91-1, RIFM ID 217-E2.12 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

RIFM natural complex substance (NCS) fragrance ingredient safety assessment, ho bark oil, CAS registry number 8022-91-1, RIFM ID 217-C2.12 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, benzyl formate, CAS Registry Number 104-57-4 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 1,1-diethoxyheptane, CAS Registry Number 688-82-4 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 1-octanol, CAS registry number 111-87-5 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 4,4a,6,7,8,8a-hexahydro-1,4-methanonaphthalen-5(1H)-one, CAS Registry Number 51519-65-4 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, amyl hexanoate, CAS registry number 540-07-8 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, undecanal, CAS Registry Number 112-44-7 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M.L. Dagli; W. Dekant; C. Deodhar; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, N-benzoylanthranilic acid, CAS Registry Number 579-93-1 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, undecyl alcohol, CAS Registry Number 112-42-5 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 1-tridecanol, CAS Registry Number 112-70-9 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, lauryl alcohol, CAS Registry Number 112-53-8 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, hexyl alcohol, CAS Registry Number 111-27-3 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, ethyl maltol, CAS Registry Number 4940-11-8 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, butyrophenone, CAS Registry Number 495-40-9 - A.M. Api; A. Bartlett; D. Belsito; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; A. Bryant-Friedrich; G.A. Burton; M.A. Cancellieri; H. Chon; M. Cronin; S. Crotty; M.L. Dagli; et al. (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2025)